Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Is Mormonism a Cult?

    The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes. 

    The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.

    One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence:

  • Behavior
  • Information
  • Thought
  • Emotion. 

    Each form of control helps a system maintain stability by shaping how people act and think. When we apply the model to Mormonism, the pattern becomes easy to see. Pay attention. I'm gonna quiz you on this.

"It is crazy just how much of a hold cults have on you. I used to think people in cults were ridiculous for not realizing they were in cults until I realized I was in a cult. They are slowly winning me back and I am absolutely terrified."

- A Letter from a Lazy Learner

Behavior Control

    Behavior control limits how people act in everyday life. The Mormon Church does this openly. Members are told what they can eat and drink, with strict rules against coffee, tea, alcohol, and tobacco. They are expected to wear modest clothing and, after temple rites, sacred garments under their clothes. The garments act as a constant physical reminder of the commitment to the Church. Dating and marriage are regulated, and only those who meet specific worthiness standards can enter the temple.

    Finances are also controlled. Members are expected to pay ten percent of their income as tithing before they can enter temples or hold certain callings. The Church connects obedience with spiritual privilege. The message is simple: to remain in good standing, every aspect of your life must align with Church standards. That kind of structure is a form of behavioral control because it ties spiritual identity to conformity.

   Information Control

    Information control manages what members can learn and trust. The Church limits access to materials that could create doubt. It promotes official websites, manuals, and talks as the only reliable sources of truth. Independent sources that question doctrine or history are labeled as “anti-Mormon.”

    For most of its history, the Church avoided open discussion of difficult topics like Joseph Smith’s use of seer stones or his secret plural marriages. Even today, while the Gospel Topics Essays exist, most members are unaware of them or are discouraged from reading them without “proper context.” This selective flow of information creates a closed system where the Church defines reality.


Thought Control

    Thought control goes deeper than restricting information. It shapes how members interpret the world. Mormonism builds mental patterns that classify ideas as faithful or dangerous. Members are taught to see doubt as weakness and to avoid “negative” voices. When someone struggles with belief, they are told to “pray for a testimony” or “doubt your doubts before you doubt your faith.” This trains people to turn skepticism inward instead of using it to question authority.

    Prophets and apostles are framed as infallible spiritual guides. When their words conflict with history or moral reasoning, the faithful response is to trust the leader and assume misunderstanding. This kind of thought conditioning keeps members from fully developing independent belief. It replaces moral reasoning with obedience.

Emotional Control

    Emotional control ties everything together. It works by creating guilt, fear, and dependency. Mormon teachings often link obedience with worthiness and disobedience with personal failure. Members are taught that sin drives away the Holy Ghost, leaving them spiritually alone. This emotional threat keeps people tied to the system, afraid to think or act outside it.

    Sexual purity culture amplifies the effect. Youth are told that sexual sin is “next to murder.” Confession to a male bishop becomes the path to forgiveness, which can cause deep shame and emotional reliance on Church authority. For women, modesty lessons often suggest that their clothing choices affect men’s thoughts, placing moral responsibility for others on their shoulders.

    Family bonds become emotional anchors. The teaching that families are eternal only if everyone remains faithful keeps people from leaving. A person who doubts risks not only social rejection but eternal separation from loved ones. That emotional leverage is one of the strongest forms of control the Church uses.

Where Mormonism Fits on the Spectrum

    Under the BITE Model, Mormonism checks boxes in every area. It does not isolate members physically or use direct violence. It does, however, control information, reward conformity, and punish deviation through guilt, exclusion, and fear of loss. Its control is polished, structured, and socially acceptable, which makes it more effective. People obey because they believe it is for their eternal good.
If that sounds familiar, it should. The same mechanisms appear in other systems. Corporations use slogans and loyalty programs to create identity. Political groups shape thought through repetition and emotional language. Even social media platforms manipulate behavior by rewarding attention and punishing silence. The machinery of belief and belonging is universal.

    So yes, Mormonism is a cult, but so are many things that shape how we think and live. 

    What really matters is not whether a group is labeled a cult but how much control it claims over the individual, and how much control that individual is okay with. The healthiest systems allow people to question and leave without fear. The unhealthiest make questioning itself a sin.

    Mormonism, like many modern institutions, falls somewhere in the middle.

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand how the BITE Model applies to Mormonism.

1. What is the main argument of this article?




2. What does “Behavior Control” refer to in the BITE Model?




3. What is a key feature of Information Control in Mormonism?




4. What is an example of Thought Control mentioned in the article?




5. What form of Emotional Control is highlighted most strongly?




6. According to the article, what role do temple garments play?




7. Why does the Church label certain topics or sources as dangerous?




8. Where does the article place Mormonism on the cult spectrum?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Peacemaker Summit and an Attempt to Silence Mormonism's Critics

 An upcoming event called the Peacemaker Summit , organized by The Holy Rebellion , is being promoted as a gathering for faithful LDS creators. The organizing vision for this event is explicitly about displacing critics of the faith by flooding social media platforms with coordinated, high-volume pro-Mormon content. That goal deserves scrutiny. My initial reaction to the original video The Stated Aim: Outnumber the Critics Travis Lish and Christian Williams from The Holy Rebellion have been clear about their motivation. They believe critics of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints dominate online spaces and that faithful voices need to overwhelm that presence. The solution being proposed is to create enough volume to hide criticisms from search results.  ... our goal is 1 billion views per month  collectively  as Latter Day Saint creators. Imagine a world where when you search Mormon or LDS or Joseph Smith  across any platform, what you would see...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...

LDS Apologists Try to Beat a Dead Horse

It looks like the topic of horses and the Book of Mormon is going to crop up every few months like a nasty case of eczema, so I feel it’s worthwhile to summarize the debate as it currently stands. There's another post on this blog  about more recent research, but it always goes back to the (in)famous analysis done by Matthew Roper and his colleagues at BYU, John Clark and Wade Ardern, all the way back to 2005. But first, let's look even further back.  What the Book of Mormon Said The word “horse” appears 14 total times in the Book of Mormon in the context of domesticated livestock, with half of those references being connected with pulling chariots of war. Both Lamanite and Nephite peoples equated these horses with those described in Isaiah 2:7 and 5:28, which Nephi expressly quotes in his own record (compare 2 Nephi 12:7 and 15:28), with no distinction made between them. The horses of the Americas, per the Book of Mormon, are intended to be the same in form and function to ...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 4: Fanaticism

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found  here - The article titled “Fanaticism” was published on February 11, 1831, in the United States Gazette , a Philadelphia paper with national circulation. It reprints material from the Painesville Gazette , reflecting local reports from northeastern Ohio rather than direct investigation by the Gazette itself. The author is unnamed, consistent with early-19th-century newspaper practice, and the tone reflects mainstream Protestant skepticism toward emerging religious movements. The piece focuses on Kirtland and nearby areas in Geauga and Cuyahoga counties at a very early stage in Mormon development, less than a year after the Book of Mormon’s publica...

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...

Encouraging Marriage: Lowering the Age for Female Missionaries

 In October 2012, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints officially lowered the minimum age for missionary service. Before that change, men could begin at age 19 and women at age 21. The update allowed men to start at 18 and women at 19, a major shift in how young Latter-day Saints approached their early adult years. That change dramatically increased missionary numbers, with applications skyrocketing in the weeks after the announcement and women making up a much larger share of those who served.   For more than a decade after that update, the rule stayed the same. Women could serve at 19 and men at 18, with women serving 18-month missions and men serving two years. In November 2025 the Church again changed the rule: the minimum age for women to serve was lowered to 18, equalizing it with men.  What made this new policy notable wasn’t just equality in age; it was the statements that came with it.   In a January 2026 interview with the Church’s own Deseret News, Presid...

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
e
Link copied!