Skip to main content

Is Mormonism a Cult?

    The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes. 

    The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.

    One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence:

  • Behavior
  • Information
  • Thought
  • Emotion. 

    Each form of control helps a system maintain stability by shaping how people act and think. When we apply the model to Mormonism, the pattern becomes easy to see. Pay attention. I'm gonna quiz you on this.

"It is crazy just how much of a hold cults have on you. I used to think people in cults were ridiculous for not realizing they were in cults until I realized I was in a cult. They are slowly winning me back and I am absolutely terrified."

- A Letter from a Lazy Learner

Behavior Control

    Behavior control limits how people act in everyday life. The Mormon Church does this openly. Members are told what they can eat and drink, with strict rules against coffee, tea, alcohol, and tobacco. They are expected to wear modest clothing and, after temple rites, sacred garments under their clothes. The garments act as a constant physical reminder of the commitment to the Church. Dating and marriage are regulated, and only those who meet specific worthiness standards can enter the temple.

    Finances are also controlled. Members are expected to pay ten percent of their income as tithing before they can enter temples or hold certain callings. The Church connects obedience with spiritual privilege. The message is simple: to remain in good standing, every aspect of your life must align with Church standards. That kind of structure is a form of behavioral control because it ties spiritual identity to conformity.

   Information Control

    Information control manages what members can learn and trust. The Church limits access to materials that could create doubt. It promotes official websites, manuals, and talks as the only reliable sources of truth. Independent sources that question doctrine or history are labeled as “anti-Mormon.”

    For most of its history, the Church avoided open discussion of difficult topics like Joseph Smith’s use of seer stones or his secret plural marriages. Even today, while the Gospel Topics Essays exist, most members are unaware of them or are discouraged from reading them without “proper context.” This selective flow of information creates a closed system where the Church defines reality.


Thought Control

    Thought control goes deeper than restricting information. It shapes how members interpret the world. Mormonism builds mental patterns that classify ideas as faithful or dangerous. Members are taught to see doubt as weakness and to avoid “negative” voices. When someone struggles with belief, they are told to “pray for a testimony” or “doubt your doubts before you doubt your faith.” This trains people to turn skepticism inward instead of using it to question authority.

    Prophets and apostles are framed as infallible spiritual guides. When their words conflict with history or moral reasoning, the faithful response is to trust the leader and assume misunderstanding. This kind of thought conditioning keeps members from fully developing independent belief. It replaces moral reasoning with obedience.

Emotional Control

    Emotional control ties everything together. It works by creating guilt, fear, and dependency. Mormon teachings often link obedience with worthiness and disobedience with personal failure. Members are taught that sin drives away the Holy Ghost, leaving them spiritually alone. This emotional threat keeps people tied to the system, afraid to think or act outside it.

    Sexual purity culture amplifies the effect. Youth are told that sexual sin is “next to murder.” Confession to a male bishop becomes the path to forgiveness, which can cause deep shame and emotional reliance on Church authority. For women, modesty lessons often suggest that their clothing choices affect men’s thoughts, placing moral responsibility for others on their shoulders.

    Family bonds become emotional anchors. The teaching that families are eternal only if everyone remains faithful keeps people from leaving. A person who doubts risks not only social rejection but eternal separation from loved ones. That emotional leverage is one of the strongest forms of control the Church uses.

Where Mormonism Fits on the Spectrum

    Under the BITE Model, Mormonism checks boxes in every area. It does not isolate members physically or use direct violence. It does, however, control information, reward conformity, and punish deviation through guilt, exclusion, and fear of loss. Its control is polished, structured, and socially acceptable, which makes it more effective. People obey because they believe it is for their eternal good.
If that sounds familiar, it should. The same mechanisms appear in other systems. Corporations use slogans and loyalty programs to create identity. Political groups shape thought through repetition and emotional language. Even social media platforms manipulate behavior by rewarding attention and punishing silence. The machinery of belief and belonging is universal.

    So yes, Mormonism is a cult, but so are many things that shape how we think and live. 

    What really matters is not whether a group is labeled a cult but how much control it claims over the individual, and how much control that individual is okay with. The healthiest systems allow people to question and leave without fear. The unhealthiest make questioning itself a sin.

    Mormonism, like many modern institutions, falls somewhere in the middle.

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand how the BITE Model applies to Mormonism.

1. What is the main argument of this article?




2. What does “Behavior Control” refer to in the BITE Model?




3. What is a key feature of Information Control in Mormonism?




4. What is an example of Thought Control mentioned in the article?




5. What form of Emotional Control is highlighted most strongly?




6. According to the article, what role do temple garments play?




7. Why does the Church label certain topics or sources as dangerous?




8. Where does the article place Mormonism on the cult spectrum?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...

What is the CES letter?

In 2012, Jeremy Runnells was struggling with questions about LDS history that he couldn’t reconcile with what he had learned growing up. He had served a mission, gone to BYU, and lived his life inside of Mormonism, but the sources he was reading didn’t line up with the version he’d been taught. When he spoke with a Church Educational System director about it, he was asked to write his concerns in one place so they could review them together. He sat down and did exactly that. He pulled notes, checked references, and laid out the issues in a document that ended up more than eighty pages long. He sent it back expecting a follow-up. The follow-up never came. That unanswered list of questions eventually became known online as the CES Letter. In April 2013, he shared his document to reddit on r/exmormon under the title “Letter to a CES Director.” The file spread fast because it pulled together problems that members usually encounter one at a time. Runnells later said he wrote it to underst...

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

   In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “ 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet. ” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God. 1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything  This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader. 2. The living prophet is more important than script...

There Is No Curse, Part 4: Who I Am

I felt closer to God when I finally stopped believing in Him.  Let me explain. When I was a kid, I’d sit in church and listen to people talk about God as if he was real . I say “he” because God was also defined as a male, and that definition supposedly came from thousands of years of tradition. God was like me : he had feelings or grief and joy; he wanted me to be happy; he had ambition and plans for me, just like I did for myself. What a wonderful thought that a Supreme Being had me in mind! But God was also “He.” I say that because the title implied a king, nobility, and sovereignty. God was not like me : He was omnipotent; He knew better than me; He was always in control; He wasn’t flawed like me; He didn’t make mistakes; He knew the end from the beginning. I couldn’t ultimately know God, but He wanted me to draw close to Him.   According to the traditions I grew up in, the way we approached God was through “righteousness,” aka, doing good things and avoiding bad things....

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...

Influencers for Zion

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced fourteen new members of the Young Men General Advisory Council , a group that aids the Young Men General Presidency in council and leadership of boys ages twelve to eighteen. The announcement has cause quite an online stir in Mormon spaces as several of these men already have established online followings. Religious youth retention is slipping and institutional messaging struggles to compete with platforms where teens spend most of their time.  Youth these days have a tendency to put a lot of trust in creators, sometimes even more than official statements. By calling men with YouTube channels, filmmaking schools, and large digital classrooms, the Church gains access to people who already know how to package a message and keep an audience engaged. These are essential skillsets for any organization to have in our online world. Who the New Council Members Are Derral E. Eves helped build The Chosen and spent years sha...
Link copied!