Skip to main content

If Jesus Came Back, Would He Recognize Christianity?

Image
By Mason
If Jesus came back today, he would not recognize what Christianity has become. The modern church is built on power, money, and influence. Whatever moral teacher he might have been, his message has been rewritten to fit the needs of institutions. The result is less a faith about truth and more a system for control.


    The French philosopher Jacques Ellul explored this process in his book The Subversion of Christianity. (Affiliate Link) He wrote that the teachings of Jesus were too disruptive to survive unchanged. The early followers of Jesus spoke about compassion, humility, and equality. Those ideas had no place in an empire built on hierarchy and control. Over time however, Christianity adapted. It learned to cooperate with authority. What started as a small movement of the poor became the official religion of the powerful.

    Ellul, who was a Christian, saw this as a betrayal. Every belief system changes once it becomes institutionalized. The moment it needs to protect itself, it stops being about ideas and starts being about structure. The Church did not corrupt a perfect message. It did what all human systems do. It used belief to maintain order and justify power.

    Jacques Ellul outlines three ways that Christianity “lies” about Jesus:

    1. Turning Jesus into an idea
The first lie happens when Jesus is reduced to an abstract concept. This occurs when theology or philosophy tries to fit him into a system—a doctrine, a political agenda, or a symbolic “truth.” Ellul says this transforms Jesus from a living person into an intellectual object. Instead of following his example, believers debate his meaning.

    2. Turning Jesus into an idol
The second lie is when Jesus becomes an object of magical or self-serving worship. Ellul uses examples like people seeking personal blessings, miracles, or national identity through him. When Jesus is used to justify power, comfort, or emotion, he becomes disguised—no longer a moral teacher but a tool for human desires.

    3. Turning Jesus into the Church
The third lie is when the Church claims to embody Jesus himself. This happens when the institution declares that it alone holds truth or salvation. In Ellul’s view, the Church turns a living faith into a static possession, treating divine truth as something it owns and controls. That shift replaces faith with authority and grace with dogma.

    In short, Ellul’s three “lies” show how Christianity continuously distances itself from its own origins: first by intellectualizing Jesus, then by idolizing him, and finally by institutionalizing him.

    You can see this pattern in modern Christianity. Churches that once preached sacrifice now celebrate prosperity. Pastors live like celebrities while calling for humility. Political movements use Christian language to claim moral authority. The faith that once questioned the powerful now depends on them. The church speaks about community but often enforces conformity. It asks for compassion but rewards loyalty.

    The contradiction is not new. Religion has always balanced between belief and control. It begins with a teacher or a vision, and then it becomes an organization. Rules replace reflection. Ritual replaces thought. In time, it becomes less about what is true and more about who is in charge. Christianity is only one example of this, though it may be one of the most visible. 

    If Jesus came back, he would likely find the same kind of people running the churches that he once criticized in the temples. He would see religious leaders selling faith as a product and using his name as a brand. He would see prayers for the poor coming from institutions that protect wealth. He would see his image on walls, his words reduced to slogans, and his life turned into marketing.

    Ellul’s book shows how belief can be twisted by the very people who claim to preserve it. To him, that was a loss of spiritual truth. To an atheist, it reveals how human nature shapes religion. 

    The Church survives not because it is divine, but because it offers belonging, identity, and certainty... all the things people crave when the world feels uncertain.


Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand Ellul’s argument about how Christianity changed once it became a powerful institution.

1. How does the article describe modern Christianity compared to Jesus’ original message?




2. According to Jacques Ellul, what happened as Christianity became institutionalized?




3. What is Ellul’s first “lie” about Jesus?




4. What is Ellul’s second “lie” about Jesus?




5. What is Ellul’s third “lie” about Jesus?




6. According to the article, what happens when a belief system needs to protect itself?




7. Which modern contradictions does the article highlight in today’s Christianity?




8. According to the article, why does the Church survive even from an atheist perspective?




Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Post a Comment
Read

Are You Temple Worthy?

By Mason
Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
6 comments
Read

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read

What is the CES letter?

By Mason
In 2012, Jeremy Runnells was struggling with questions about LDS history that he couldn’t reconcile with what he had learned growing up. He had served a mission, gone to BYU, and lived his life inside of Mormonism, but the sources he was reading didn’t line up with the version he’d been taught. When he spoke with a Church Educational System director about it, he was asked to write his concerns in one place so they could review them together. He sat down and did exactly that. He pulled notes, checked references, and laid out the issues in a document that ended up more than eighty pages long. He sent it back expecting a follow-up. The follow-up never came. That unanswered list of questions eventually became known online as the CES Letter. In April 2013, he shared his document to reddit on r/exmormon under the title “Letter to a CES Director.” The file spread fast because it pulled together problems that members usually encounter one at a time. Runnells later said he wrote it to underst...
1 comment
Read

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

By Mason
   In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “ 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet. ” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God. 1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything  This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader. 2. The living prophet is more important than script...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 4: Who I Am

By
I felt closer to God when I finally stopped believing in Him.  Let me explain. When I was a kid, I’d sit in church and listen to people talk about God as if he was real . I say “he” because God was also defined as a male, and that definition supposedly came from thousands of years of tradition. God was like me : he had feelings or grief and joy; he wanted me to be happy; he had ambition and plans for me, just like I did for myself. What a wonderful thought that a Supreme Being had me in mind! But God was also “He.” I say that because the title implied a king, nobility, and sovereignty. God was not like me : He was omnipotent; He knew better than me; He was always in control; He wasn’t flawed like me; He didn’t make mistakes; He knew the end from the beginning. I couldn’t ultimately know God, but He wanted me to draw close to Him.   According to the traditions I grew up in, the way we approached God was through “righteousness,” aka, doing good things and avoiding bad things....
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read

Influencers for Zion

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced fourteen new members of the Young Men General Advisory Council , a group that aids the Young Men General Presidency in council and leadership of boys ages twelve to eighteen. The announcement has cause quite an online stir in Mormon spaces as several of these men already have established online followings. Religious youth retention is slipping and institutional messaging struggles to compete with platforms where teens spend most of their time.  Youth these days have a tendency to put a lot of trust in creators, sometimes even more than official statements. By calling men with YouTube channels, filmmaking schools, and large digital classrooms, the Church gains access to people who already know how to package a message and keep an audience engaged. These are essential skillsets for any organization to have in our online world. Who the New Council Members Are Derral E. Eves helped build The Chosen and spent years sha...
Post a Comment
Read
Link copied!