Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

If Jesus Came Back, Would He Recognize Christianity?

If Jesus came back today, he would not recognize what Christianity has become. The modern church is built on power, money, and influence. Whatever moral teacher he might have been, his message has been rewritten to fit the needs of institutions. The result is less a faith about truth and more a system for control.


    The French philosopher Jacques Ellul explored this process in his book The Subversion of Christianity. (Affiliate Link) He wrote that the teachings of Jesus were too disruptive to survive unchanged. The early followers of Jesus spoke about compassion, humility, and equality. Those ideas had no place in an empire built on hierarchy and control. Over time however, Christianity adapted. It learned to cooperate with authority. What started as a small movement of the poor became the official religion of the powerful.

    Ellul, who was a Christian, saw this as a betrayal. Every belief system changes once it becomes institutionalized. The moment it needs to protect itself, it stops being about ideas and starts being about structure. The Church did not corrupt a perfect message. It did what all human systems do. It used belief to maintain order and justify power.

    Jacques Ellul outlines three ways that Christianity “lies” about Jesus:

    1. Turning Jesus into an idea
The first lie happens when Jesus is reduced to an abstract concept. This occurs when theology or philosophy tries to fit him into a system—a doctrine, a political agenda, or a symbolic “truth.” Ellul says this transforms Jesus from a living person into an intellectual object. Instead of following his example, believers debate his meaning.

    2. Turning Jesus into an idol
The second lie is when Jesus becomes an object of magical or self-serving worship. Ellul uses examples like people seeking personal blessings, miracles, or national identity through him. When Jesus is used to justify power, comfort, or emotion, he becomes disguised—no longer a moral teacher but a tool for human desires.

    3. Turning Jesus into the Church
The third lie is when the Church claims to embody Jesus himself. This happens when the institution declares that it alone holds truth or salvation. In Ellul’s view, the Church turns a living faith into a static possession, treating divine truth as something it owns and controls. That shift replaces faith with authority and grace with dogma.

    In short, Ellul’s three “lies” show how Christianity continuously distances itself from its own origins: first by intellectualizing Jesus, then by idolizing him, and finally by institutionalizing him.

    You can see this pattern in modern Christianity. Churches that once preached sacrifice now celebrate prosperity. Pastors live like celebrities while calling for humility. Political movements use Christian language to claim moral authority. The faith that once questioned the powerful now depends on them. The church speaks about community but often enforces conformity. It asks for compassion but rewards loyalty.

    The contradiction is not new. Religion has always balanced between belief and control. It begins with a teacher or a vision, and then it becomes an organization. Rules replace reflection. Ritual replaces thought. In time, it becomes less about what is true and more about who is in charge. Christianity is only one example of this, though it may be one of the most visible. 

    If Jesus came back, he would likely find the same kind of people running the churches that he once criticized in the temples. He would see religious leaders selling faith as a product and using his name as a brand. He would see prayers for the poor coming from institutions that protect wealth. He would see his image on walls, his words reduced to slogans, and his life turned into marketing.

    Ellul’s book shows how belief can be twisted by the very people who claim to preserve it. To him, that was a loss of spiritual truth. To an atheist, it reveals how human nature shapes religion. 

    The Church survives not because it is divine, but because it offers belonging, identity, and certainty... all the things people crave when the world feels uncertain.


Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand Ellul’s argument about how Christianity changed once it became a powerful institution.

1. How does the article describe modern Christianity compared to Jesus’ original message?




2. According to Jacques Ellul, what happened as Christianity became institutionalized?




3. What is Ellul’s first “lie” about Jesus?




4. What is Ellul’s second “lie” about Jesus?




5. What is Ellul’s third “lie” about Jesus?




6. According to the article, what happens when a belief system needs to protect itself?




7. Which modern contradictions does the article highlight in today’s Christianity?




8. According to the article, why does the Church survive even from an atheist perspective?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Floodlit: Shedding Light on Sexual Abuse

Sexual abuse within religion is not limited to one faith or one culture. It appears in churches, temples, synagogues, and mosques around the world.  The same systems that promise moral direction and community can also aid abusers in hiding their wrongdoing. When power is concentrated in spiritual authority, questioning leaders can feel like questioning God. That fear keeps many victims silent for years. Across history, investigations have revealed deep problems in multiple religious institutions. The Catholic Church, the Southern Baptist Convention, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and others have faced reports of abuse and cover-ups. The pattern is painfully consistent across the board. Allegations are dismissed, offenders are quietly moved, and victims are told to stay quiet for the sake of the church’s reputation . Each time the truth surfaces, it raises the same questions: -How could this happen? -Who allowed it to continue? The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is no...

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

The Pattern of Decline in The First Book of Napoleon

At first glance, The First Book of Napoleon: The Tyrant of the Earth  (1809) by Eliakim the Scribe (likely a pseudonym of Michael Linning) appears to be nothing more than a biblical retelling of the French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. However... although The First Book of Napoleon and the Book of Mormon describe vastly different peoples, places, and historical events, both books present a remarkably similar explanation for the rise and fall of civilizations.  One of the most recognizable themes in the Book of Mormon is commonly call the " pride cycle ." Throughout the Nephite record, societies prosper when they are faithful to God. Prosperity eventually leads to complacency, complacency gives rise to pride, pride produces wickedness, and wickedness brings suffering and destruction. Affliction humbles the people, leading to repentance and a return to righteousness before the cycle begins again. Eliakim the Scribe similarly argues that political collapse is m...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

I Watched the Peacemaker Summit So You Don't Have To

If you're like most people, you didn't even know this was happening; and, like a good sneeze, it was gone by the time you realized it. (Be warned: there's a lot of YouTube and Instagram posts linked in this article.) Who is The Holy Rebellion? If you're not familiar with The Holy Rebellion , they're a pair of LDS business investors and influencers from Utah - Travis Lish and Christian Williams . In an interview with Greg Matsen of The Cwic Show online podcast, the boys at The Holy Rebellion describe how the y came up with their Instagram handle (and I'll highlight some interesting statements): So we, starting at from that point - this was probably four, five, six years ago even - but we just kind of started meeting...and over time, it became clear that the only thing - our biggest mutual interest was the gospel of Jesus Christ ...and we were talking about Paul and how Paul was just unashamed...and we concluded that if we want to be like Paul, we have to find th...

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...

The Temple Emphasis and Decline of Tithing

A review of General Conference discourse in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints reveals an interesting shift. Temples have always been mentioned more often than tithing, but the gap has widened dramatically in recent decades. References to tithing appear to be steadily declining, while references to temples have skyrocketed. The question is why. Data was pulled in 2024 from www.lds-general-conference.org  The 2020 dataset sees a large decline in both Tithing and Temple references due to only being halfway through the decade In the nineteenth century, church leaders spoke openly about tithing because the church needed money. The institution faced repeated financial strain. The Panic of 1893 damaged the Utah economy, and federal legislation such as the Edmunds–Tucker Act of 1887 resulted in the confiscation of church property. Under those conditions, leaders frequently urged members to contribute financially. That urgency faded once the church stabilized its finances. In...

xmormon.org

I recently started putting together xmormon.org , a sister site to luciferslantern.com. The focus of the site is pretty straightforward: collecting the stories of ex-Mormons throughout history and building a resource center for people who have left the church. The basic premise is that people have been leaving Mormonism since the earliest days of the church. If you’ve left, or you’re in the middle of figuring out what leaving means for you, you’re not the first person to walk that road. You won’t be the last either. Because I'm impatient and want to get this ball rolling, I’m using Wikipedia’s Creative Commons license to get initial articls poated. This license allows existing articles to be copied and adapted as long as the license requirements are followed. From there, I’m giving each article a more standard format, then adding context, cleanup, and workikg to add original material over time. I’m just one guy, so this seemed like the most realistic way to start building the site ...

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...
e
Link copied!