Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

There Is No Curse, Part 3: The Human Race

Never has any passage of scripture come with more scrupulosity to the heart of man than Mosiah 3:19 has to me:

For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever…

It’s a passage which seemed to enter with great shame into every feeling of my heart. I heard this passage mentioned and quoted again and again - it appears in General Conference addresses a total of 347 times, over half of which occurring in my lifetime (according to the LDS General Conference Corpus). It’s a passage that implies a divine curse on not just one people group, not on one continent, but on the whole of the human species - an original sin, as it were.

Mosiah 3:19 would have you believe that you and I are God’s personal enemies, because we are the posterity of Adam and Eve. Depending on how you read LDS theology, I either did or didn’t have a choice here, a subject too dense to get into just yet; and either way, an omniscient God supposedly laid the groundwork for my birth. According elsewhere in the Book of Mormon (specifically, 2 Nephi 2), God actually created those preconditions precisely because he intended for me to be born of Adam and Eve…only to be immediately assigned a status as enemy of the sovereign god of the universe.

If I were making a model plane and needed to use glue, how could I also accuse that glue of being my enemy? I could only get mad if it were my own incompetence that got my fingers stuck together, but it’s not the glue’s fault - that’s just what it does. God, if he is not incompetent but omniscient and omnipotent, would hardly see our fallen nature as a threat, and LDS doctrine repeatedly echoes Paul’s sentiments that “[God’s] power is made perfect in weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:9; compare with Jacob 4:7, Alma 26:12, Ether 12:27, D&C 35:13). That’s not the language someone uses about their enemy.

Growing up in the LDS church, this scripture paralyzed me with fear. I wanted to love God, and I thought he loved me, and yet he saw me as his enemy? I knew that Jesus taught to love our enemies, but the existence of an enemy is the result of flawed human nature, not the product of a loving Heavenly Father. In fact, it brought me immense solace to read in Matthew that God was so good that He would give good things to His children who sought Him out. What good man gives a stone when his children ask for bread (see Matthew 7:9-12)?

Now you may be asking, what’s so wrong with recognizing that there is a tremendous gap between our imperfect and fallible states and the perfect and infallible state of God? Because, dear reader, that is not the only implication of these passages. To be separated from God is not the same as being exiled from God - exiled for something for which I bear no responsibility, because of a nature that I did not choose, nor can I choose to put off without God in the first place.

Some faithful LDS members will attempt to rationalize the sober implications of Mosiah 3:19 by appealing to the second half of the verse, which at first glance does imply that man’s fallen nature is not necessarily inevitable:

…unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.

First of all, the word “inflict” seems at direct odds to Jesus’s assurance in Matthew 7 that God is too good to return evil for good, and yet that is what the God of Mosiah 3:19 intends for his children, even when they become saints. Of course, no Mormon will say that being God’s chosen people makes them exempt from suffering, but if our fallen state were merely a separation, there would be no need for God to cause suffering, and any parent caught acting this way with their children in real life would be immediately castigated and possibly even arrested for child abuse.

More astonishing, though, is that the author reasons that “little children” are automatically covered by Christ’s atonement because of - get this - their fallen nature. That is to say, in spite of the fallen nature of little children, they are automatically spared; but that same fallen nature condemns us as adults. The LDS myth of the “age of accountability” does nothing to assuage this contradiction - in spite of sharing a fallen nature, little children are exempt from condemnation (to say nothing of the author’s complete lack of awareness that toddlers are, in fact, not submissive, humble, or patient!).

Once again, there is a much simpler explanation: Mosiah 3:19 exists in contradiction to the other frequent invocations of the fall of Adam in LDS doctrine, and any attempt to harmonize them inevitably results in prioritizing one passage over another via special pleading, such that neither is read for what they say, but instead transformed into something none of them say. In short, Mosiah 3:19 is an inaccurate depiction of humanity even in the LDS church, and in no way demonstrates that humanity is cursed for having fallen.

Our human nature is not a curse, it's just who we are.


Keep Reading: Part 1    Part 2    Part 4    Part 5

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand the critique of Mosiah 3:19 and the LDS doctrine of the “natural man.”

1. What emotional impact did Mosiah 3:19 have on the author while growing up?




2. What central contradiction does the author highlight about being an “enemy to God”?




3. How does the author contrast Mosiah 3:19 with the teachings of Jesus in Matthew 7?




4. What issue does the author raise about the verse’s assumption that children are submissive and meek?




5. Why does the “age of accountability” fail to resolve the doctrinal tension?




6. What broader conclusion does the author reach about Mosiah 3:19?




7. What message does the author leave readers with?




8. What rhetorical point does the author make with the image of Adam and Eve being cast out?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...

A Bit of Original Evidence

In May 1900, Theodore A. Schroeder published an article titled A Bit of Original Evidence  in issue no. 9 of Lucifer’s Lantern . [1] The piece reproduces part of an 1887 letter apparently written by Mississippi attorney E. E. Baldwin to W. O. Norrell of Salt Lake City. [1] [2] Baldwin attributed the story to his uncle by marriage, James G. Horton, who allegedly said that Joseph Smith and several companions staged the discovery of the Book of Mormon plates as a practical joke and used a Bible-shaped box packed with sand. [1] Other accounts conflict with the claim that the box contained only sand. William Smith stated that members of the Smith family felt the plates through the cloth covering them and could distinguish their individual leaves. Martin Harris reported that Alvah Beman heard a metallic sound when the plates were placed inside the box. Those who said they lifted the covered object also estimated that it weighed between forty and sixty pounds, which would be difficult ...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

The Church is Changing the Sunday Schedule... Again

On September 6, 2026, Latter-day Saints will arrive at church to find the second hour rearranged. Sacrament meeting will remain no longer than 60 minutes. Adults and youth will then attend 25 minutes of Sunday School every week, followed by 25 minutes of Relief Society, elders quorum, Young Women, or Aaronic Priesthood quorum instruction. Primary will meet for 55 minutes. The alternating schedule introduced with two-hour church in 2019 will be gone.¹ The First Presidency's March announcement put the change plainly: In the new schedule, sacrament meeting will continue to be no longer than 60 minutes. After a 5‑minute transition, youth and adults will attend a 25‑minute Sunday School class each week. Following another 5‑minute transition, they will attend a 25‑minute priesthood quorum, Relief Society, or Young Women meeting. Primary will continue to meet weekly and will now last 55 minutes.¹ The schedule is a modest administrative revision. The institution capable of making it, thoug...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Don't Be a Sea Lion

Religious arguments online tend to follow a familiar pattern. Someone makes a claim. Another person asks a question. An answer is given, but the questioner does not really engage with it. They ask for another source, then another explanation, then proof of some smaller point buried inside the original answer. Every response produces three new questions. When the other person finally becomes irritated or leaves, the questioner declares victory. “I was only asking questions.” “Why are you afraid of a civil discussion?” “If your position were true, you should be able to defend it.” This behavior is often called sea lioning. It looks like curiosity, but functions as harassment. It uses the language of calm discussion without accepting the responsibilities of an honest one. Religious believers do it. Critics of religion do it. Apologists, atheists, pastors, ex-believers, missionaries, and anonymous accounts do it...  No position has a monopoly on good faith. The name itself comes from D...

What Would It Take to Show Christianity Is False?

If Christianity's central claims are correct, then the universe has a creator who became incarnate in Jesus of Nazareth, died for the sins of the world, rose bodily from the dead, and continues to offer eternal life to those who trust in him. If these claims are true, they deserve not merely admiration but allegiance. They would represent the defining events of human history. If they are false, however, the implications are equally profound. Christianity has shaped civilizations, inspired art, influenced governments, comforted the dying, motivated charity, justified wars, and guided the lives of billions of people. A religion with that kind of influence should not simply be accepted because it is ancient or widely believed. It should be examined with the same seriousness its claims demand. C. S. Lewis understood this point perhaps better than anyone. Although remembered as one of Christianity's most influential defenders, he famously observed in God in the Dock: Essays on Theol...

Caring for the Poor Has Been Low on the Mormon Priority List

We can't deny that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints provides millions of dollars each year in humanitarian aide, and that many members serve generously. But this aide is pennies compared to what the church spends on temples, their stock portfolio and real estate collections. Which begs the question, where does humanitarian work rank in the Church’s own mission? For decades, Church leaders defined that mission around preaching, ordinances, and salvation. By the Church’s own messaging, caring for the poor has historically been one of the Church's lowest institutional priorities. 1936 to 1981: Welfare was meant to build character During the Great Depression, the First Presidency tied welfare to work, independence, thrift, and self-respect. The goal was to help people provide for themselves. In 1936, J. Reuben Clark said that the welfare system had one primary goal: building character , an idea in which he repeated again in 1981. The real long-term objective of th...

A Girl's Letters from Nauvoo.

On January 3, 1843, Charlotte Haven sat down in a small cottage overlooking the Mississippi and wrote to her parents in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. She had arrived in Nauvoo only days earlier to spend the winter with her brother Henderson and his wife, Elizabeth. Haven was not a Latter-day Saint. Her skepticism appears in the opening lines: [1] As I write Nauvoo, I look at the word with perfect amazement, and almost doubt my own senses when I find myself an inhabitant of this city of fanatics, for never did I expect to see the place, far less to indite letters to my dear parents from it. [1] Haven's letters appeared nearly forty-eight years later in the Overland Monthly under the title "A Girl's Letters from Nauvoo." They are openly critical and should be read as one outsider's testimony, not as a neutral transcript. Still, she recorded small details that official histories often leave out: the bitter cold, muddy streets, unfinished homes, crowded worship services,...