Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Code Names and Church Finances

Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used. 

The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization.

Ensign Peak

This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements. 

The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.  Per the SEC's 2023 report:

"The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against Ensign Peak Advisers Inc., a non-profit entity operated by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to manage the Church’s investments, for failing to file forms that would have disclosed the Church’s equity investments, and for instead filing forms for shell companies that obscured the Church’s portfolio and misstated Ensign Peak’s control over the Church’s investment decisions. The SEC also announced charges against the Church for causing these violations. To settle the charges, Ensign Peak agreed to pay a $4 million penalty and the Church agreed to pay a $1 million penalty."

The fact the the church was attempting to hide its financial activities is incredibly clear in the very simple fact that none of the names used for the shell companies are in any way related to Mormonism:

    Ashmore Wealth Management, LLC
    Argyll Research, LLC
    Clifton Park Capital Management, LLC
    Cortland Advisers, LLC
    Elkfork Partners, LLC
    Flinton Capital Management, LLC
    Glen Harbor Capital Management, LLC
    Green Valley Investors, LLC
    Meadow Creek Investment Management, LLC
    Neuburgh Advisers, LLC
    Riverhead Capital Management, LLC
    Tiverton Asset Management, LLC
    Tyers Asset Management, LLC


In the Beginning


Financial secrecy using altered names is not new for the church. In the 1830s Joseph Smith established the United Firm, a small group of leaders who managed the church’s printing operations, storehouses, land purchases, and money. The structure of this firm was hidden through the use of secret names.



The United Firm functioned like a business partnership, and at a time when lawsuits and debts were common, openly naming the leaders involved could expose them to personal liability. To reduce that risk, the church replaced real names with code names in several Doctrine and Covenants sections. Leaders, cities, and even buildings were disguised. It made the Firm harder to identify in court and protected the individuals tied to it. 

The revelations that historically used code names are found in what is now Doctrine and Covenants sections 78, 82, 92, 96, 103, 104, and 105 (as organized by the Utah church). The earliest of these dates to March 1, 1832, and the last to June 22, 1834. Except for sections 103 and 105, all were published in the 1835 Doctrine and Covenants with only the pseudonyms. 

From 1844 through 1869, every edition continued to print the full set of these sections using the code names alone. In later LDS printings, the approach changed. The 1876 and 1921 editions kept the pseudonyms but added the real names in parentheses. The 1981 LDS edition removed the code names entirely and used only the actual identities. 

The Community of Christ still includes the pseudonyms in its edition, offering a brief guide to their real counterparts in the section headings.



The Sections

"The Lord spake unto Enoch [Joseph Smith Jun.], ...ye should, who are joined together in this order; or in other words, let my servant Ahashdah [Newel K. Whitney], and my servant Gazelam [Joseph Smith], or Enoch [Joseph Smith], and my servant Pelagoram [Sidney Rigdon], sit in council with the Saints which are in Zion..."


"...Therefore, verily I say unto you, that it is expedient for my servant Alam [Edward Partridge] and Ahashdah [Newel K. Whitney], Mahalaleel [Sidney Gilbert] and Pelagoram [Sidney Rigdon], and my servant Gazelam [Joseph Smith], Horah [John Whitmer], and Olihah [Oliver Cowdery], and Shalemanasseh [Martin Harris], and Mehnoreson [Martin Harris], be bound together by a bond and covenant that cannot be broken by transgression except judgment shall immediately follow, in your several stewardships... in the land of Zion and in the land of Shinehah [Kirtland], for I have consecrated the land of Shinehah [Kirtland] in mine own due time for the benefit of the Saints of the Most High..."



 "...a revelation and commandment concerning my servant Shederlaomach [Frederick G. Williams] that ye shall receive him into the order..."



"...let my servant Ahashdah [Newel K. Whitney] take charge of the place which is named among you..It is wisdom, and expedient in me, that my servant Zombre [John Johnson], whose offering I have accepted...should become a member of the order..."



“…my servant Baurak Ale [Joseph Smith, Jun.] is the man to whom I likened the servant in the parable which I have given unto you… let my servant Baurak Ale [Joseph Smith, Jun.] go unto the strength of my house… gather yourselves together unto the land of Zion… pray earnestly that peradventure my servant Baurak Ale [Joseph Smith] may go with you and preside in the midst of my people…”



“…and now, concerning the properties of the order…let my servant Pelagoram [Sidney Rigdon] have the place where he now resides, and the lot of Tahhanes [Tannersville] for his stewardship… "

“…let my servant Mahemson [Martin Harris] receive the lot of land which my servant Zombre [John Johnson] obtained in exchange for his former inheritance…"

“…and let my servant Mahemson [Martin Harris] devote his moneys for the proclaiming of my words, as my servant Gazelam [Joseph Smith Jun.,] shall direct…”

“…let my servant Shederlaomach [Frederick G. Williams] have the place where he now dwells…”

“…and let my servant Olihah [Oliver Cowdery] receive the lot appointed for the Lane-shine-house [Printing Office], even lot number one, and also the lot where his father resides…”

“…and let my servants Shederlaomach [Frederick G. Williams] and Olihah [Oliver Cowdery] have the Lane-shine-house [Printing Office] and all things that pertain unto it… and inasmuch as they are faithful, I will bless and multiply blessings upon them…”

“…let my servant Zombre [John Johnson] have the house in which he lives, and the inheritance… save only the ground reserved for the building of my houses…”

“…and let him also receive those lots which have been named for my servant Olihah [Oliver Cowdery]…”

“…let my servant Ahashdah [Newel K. Whitney] receive the houses and lot where he now resides… and the lot south of the Ozondah [Storehouse], and the lot on which the Shule [Ashery] stands…”

“…all this have I appointed to my servant Ahashdah [Newel K. Whitney] for his stewardship, for a blessing upon him and his seed… and inasmuch as he is faithful in keeping my commandments, I will multiply blessings upon him…”

“…and again, let my servant Gazelam [Joseph Smith Jun] receive the lot appointed unto him… for the building of my house… and also the inheritance upon which his father lives…”

“…and this is the beginning of the stewardship I have appointed unto my servant Gazelam [Joseph Smith jun]… and if he is faithful, I will multiply blessings upon him…”

“…you shall no longer be bound as an united order to your brethren of Zion… but after you are organized you shall be called the united order of the stake of Zion, the city of Shinehah [Kirtland]…”

“…write speedily unto Cainhannoch [New York], according to that which shall be dictated by my Spirit… and I will soften the hearts of those to whom you are in debt, that bondage may be taken away…”

“…your brethren, after they are organized, shall be called the united order of the city of Zion… and they shall transact business in their own name… and you shall do your business in your own name, and in your own time…”



"…I have commanded my servant Baurak Ale [Joseph Smith], Jun to go unto the strength of my house… until my servant Baurak Ale [Joseph Smith Jun] and Baneemy [mine elders]… shall have time to gather up the strength of my house…

__________


The instinct to shield financial operations, limit visibility, and protect the institution first has been present from the start. This points to an ongoing pattern in the church’s history, where sensitive financial or organizational details are adjusted, obscured, or revealed only when leaders decide the risk has passed.

Now consider this: If Joseph Smith was willing to make up new names for existing people and places in order to mask the true nature of his writings in the Doctrine and Covenants, then whose to say that he didn't do the same thing in The Book of Mormon?


Know Your Codenames:

Test how well you remember the codenames used in the United Order revelations.

1. Who was known by the codename “Gazelam”?




2. Who was known by the codename “Ahashdah”?




3. Who was known by the codename “Pelagoram”?




4. Who was known by the codename “Alam”?




5. Who was known by the codename “Shederlaomach”?




6. Who was known by the codename “Zombre”?




7. Who was known by the codename “Baurak Ale”?




8. Who was known by the codename “Mahemson”?




9. Who was known by the codename “Olihah”?




10. In these revelations, the place name “Shinehah” refers to which real-world location?




11. “Lane-shine-house” is a codename for what?




12. “Cainhannoch” is the codename for which place?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...

How Does the Mormon Church Keep Finding Me?

The “Locating Members” page on the church’s Tech Wiki, now removed from the public site, explains that when a member moves without providing a new address, local leaders are expected to try to find out where that person went. The responsibility usually falls to the ward clerk, working under the direction of the bishop. The record isn’t automatically dropped just because attendance stops.  The full set of instructions is found below, but first, here are some points you need to consider about the religion systematically tracking down "lost" members. Form provided by the wiki First, the system does not recognize disengagement as a valid outcome. The wiki makes clear that when someone stops attending or moves without updating records, the organization treats this as missing data, not a personal decision. Silence is interpreted as a problem to solve. That alone creates an unhealthy dynamic because it removes a person’s ability to quietly exit. Second, the responsibility is instit...

Influencers for Zion

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced fourteen new members of the Young Men General Advisory Council , a group that aids the Young Men General Presidency in council and leadership of boys ages twelve to eighteen. The announcement has cause quite an online stir in Mormon spaces as several of these men already have established online followings. Religious youth retention is slipping and institutional messaging struggles to compete with platforms where teens spend most of their time.  Youth these days have a tendency to put a lot of trust in creators, sometimes even more than official statements. By calling men with YouTube channels, filmmaking schools, and large digital classrooms, the Church gains access to people who already know how to package a message and keep an audience engaged. These are essential skillsets for any organization to have in our online world. Who the New Council Members Are Derral E. Eves helped build The Chosen and spent years sha...

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...

Mormon Church Loosens Grip on the KJV Bible

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has clarified its position on Bible translations. In its official statement, “ Holy Bible Translations and Editions Used by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ,” the Church explains that it values multiple Bible translations because they help people understand scripture “in the language they know best” .  The statement affirms that the King James Version (KJV) remains the preferred English Bible for Church use, while also acknowledging that some readers benefit from more modern language. That group includes youth, new converts, and people learning English. The recommended English Bible translations are as follows: Source: churchofjesuschrist.org Concerns about KJV comprehension have existed for decades. Yet only now does the handbook clearly frame Bible use around reading level and understanding. The update formalizes what many families were already doing.  The challenge is easy to identify. The KJV was trans...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Link copied!