Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

 

 In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet.” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God.

1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything
 This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader.

2. The living prophet is more important than scripture
 Benson teaches that current revelation outweighs the Bible and other LDS texts. This means that if the prophet’s words contradict scripture, his words still carry the greater authority. Scripture becomes flexible while modern leadership becomes the final word.

3. The living prophet is more important than past prophets
 This principle allows present-day leaders to reverse or override earlier teachings without admitting error. Contradictions can be labeled as new revelation rather than as corrections to earlier doctrines. The past becomes adjustable whenever necessary.

4. The prophet will never lead the church astray
 This functions as a claim of practical infallibility. If the prophet cannot lead the church astray, then his direction is protected from criticism by definition. Members are encouraged to question themselves rather than question leadership.

5. The prophet does not need training or credentials to speak on any subject
 Revelation is treated as a substitute for expertise. The prophet can speak on politics, science, medicine, or any other field regardless of background or experience. This gives religious leaders influence in areas where factual knowledge should matter.

6. The prophet does not need to say “Thus saith the Lord”
 Anything said in an official setting can be treated as binding. There is no clear distinction between personal opinion and divine command. Members are expected to follow either one with the same level of trust.

7. The prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know
 This framing shifts responsibility away from leadership. If a teaching feels harsh or confusing, the assumption becomes that the member must adjust. Discomfort is treated as a sign of spiritual weakness rather than a reason to reconsider the message.

8. The prophet is not limited by human reasoning
 Reasoning and evidence take a lower position beneath revelation. If logic conflicts with prophetic statements, members are encouraged to rely on faith over analysis. This discourages thoughtful examination of teachings.

9. The prophet can receive revelation on any issue
 This includes spiritual doctrines, political questions, and practical decisions. Nothing is outside his jurisdiction. The scope of authority extends into every part of an individual’s life.

10. The prophet may involve himself in civic matters
 This principle supports political involvement and justifies public statements about laws and social issues. Members are taught to treat those statements as spiritually guided, which influences voting and civic behavior.

11. Those who struggle most are the proud who are learned or wealthy
 This portrays intellectual hesitation as pride. Education becomes suspect when it leads to questions. The principle encourages members to distrust critical thinking and view it as a barrier to faith.

12. The prophet will not be popular with the world
 This reinforces the idea that criticism is proof of righteousness. Pushback is framed as expected opposition rather than as a signal that something may be wrong. External dissent is interpreted as validation.

13. The prophet and his counselors form the First Presidency
 This strengthens the organizational hierarchy. The First Presidency sits at the top, and its decisions override those of any other governing body. Their collective voice shapes doctrine and policy for the entire church.

14. Follow the prophet and be blessed. Reject him and suffer
 The final principle presents obedience as the path to safety and disobedience as the path to suffering. It leaves no room for personal conscience or disagreement. Loyalty becomes the measure of righteousness.

What the Fundamentals Reveal

 Taken together, the 14 fundamentals create a system in which the prophet stands above scripture, tradition, personal revelation, and even common sense. They present obedience as a spiritual mandate and treat questioning as a sign of weakness or pride. Someone’s response to this structure depends on how they view authority, but the purpose of the fundamentals is clear. They are designed to place the prophet at the center of religious life and to ensure that his voice remains unquestioned within the church.

Check Your Understanding: 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet

Test what you remember about Ezra Taft Benson’s “14 Fundamentals” and how this article analyzes them.

1. What is the main focus of this article?




2. In what setting did Ezra Taft Benson originally present the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet”?




3. What is the first fundamental Benson lists?




4. How does the article describe the claim that the living prophet is more important than scripture?




5. How does the article interpret the idea that “the prophet will never lead the church astray”?




6. What concern does the article raise about the claim that the prophet does not need training or credentials?




7. According to the article, what is the effect of the idea that the prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know?




8. How does the article say the “proud who are learned or wealthy” framing affects members?




9. What is the concern about the teaching that the prophet “will not be popular with the world”?




10. Overall, how does the article say the 14 fundamentals shape the role of the prophet?




Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...
3 comments
Read

How the Book of Mormon Has Changed Since 1830

     Discussion of changes to the Book of Mormon often settles into two opposing claims: either the book has remained essentially unchanged since 1830, or later editors rewrote it beyond recognition. The reality is that both positions carry a bit of truth. Although the main narrative remains recognizable, the book has changed in several distinct ways. Its wording and grammar were revised in the early editions.⁶ , ⁷ The chapter and verse system was reorganized in 1879, while chapter summaries were added in 1920.¹⁹ Those summaries and other study aids were revised again in 2013 and 2025.²⁰ , ²¹ Following these changes in chronological order makes their differences easier to see. The history begins with dictation in 1829 and continues through the original and printer’s manuscripts, the 1830 printing, Joseph Smith’s revisions, and the later editorial committees that produced the modern edition. Tracing that sequence also makes it possible to distinguish changes to the script...
Post a Comment
Read

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Everything You Need to Know About the Salt Lake Temple

  The Salt Lake Temple will open to the public from April 5 through October 1, 2027, before it is rededicated and again restricted to Latter-day Saints with temple recommends. [2] Reservations opened on September 1, 2026, and one million tour spaces were claimed in less than 24 hours. [1] The Church describes the event as only the second public open house in the temple’s 134-year history. [2] The building visitors will enter is both old and substantially new. [12] [13] Construction began in 1853 and ended with the temple’s dedication in April 1893, but the interior has been altered repeatedly since then. [3] [20] The current renovation adds about 100,000 square feet of underground space, two baptistries instead of one, five instruction rooms, and 22 sealing rooms instead of 13. [12] The temple now rests on 98 base isolators about 20 feet below the structure, part of a seismic system designed to allow substantial horizontal movement during a major earthquake. [14] [24] The chan...
Post a Comment
Read

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...
1 comment
Read

Mormonism's Complicated History With Caffeine

Ask whether Latter-day Saints can drink caffeine and the current answer is yes. The Church’s own historical summary says caffeine has been “left to the judgment of individual Saints” and is not prohibited as a condition for receiving a temple recommend. [3] That answer is clearer today than it was for much of the twentieth century. Church leaders and publications repeatedly discussed caffeine as a drug, a poison, a potentially habit-forming substance, and at times as the apparent reason coffee and tea were objectionable. Some leaders extended that reasoning directly to cola drinks. In 1965, the First Presidency even told a bishop that decaffeinated coffee did not violate the Word of Wisdom and should not disqualify an otherwise worthy member from a temple recommend.[5] The result was a long period in which formal policy, medical explanation, and everyday Mormon culture did not always point in exactly the same direction. That history helps explain why older and younger Latter-day Saints...
Post a Comment
Read

Mormon Stories Fires Back: The Core Defenses Against the LDS Lawsuit

In April 2026, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its intellectual property arm, Intellectual Reserve, filed a federal lawsuit against the Open Stories Foundation and John Dehlin. The complaint alleges trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and consumer confusion arising from the use of the name Mormon Stories, its branding, and its use of Church-related images.      The Church portrays the case as a straightforward effort to protect its trademarks and prevent confusion among people seeking information about the faith. Mormon Stories sees the case very differently. In its response and counterclaim , the organization argues that the Church is attempting to claim ownership over a word that belongs to an entire religious movement while using intellectual property law against one of its most visible critics. Here are the major arguments at the center of the dispute.
1 comment
Read

No. The Mormon Church is Not Suddenly Opposed to Gambling

Almost immediately after President D. Todd Christofferson said, “Gambling is morally wrong,” during the October 2026 General Conference, the LDS apologetic account @allthoseinfavor reacted as though the Church had just drawn a new moral line on gambling. Which personally is a bit concerning, seeing as the account runs a podcast discussing all aspects of Mormonism, including the history of the church. So I find it hard to believe that they haven't ever encountered the anti-gambling position of the church in their studies. Christofferson’s talk was certainly timely. He described a world in which smartphones have made sports betting, casino-style games, and prediction markets available almost anywhere, and he warned against treating an occasional wager as harmless entertainment.[1] But the moral judgment itself was not new. In fact, the Church had used almost the same words more than a century earlier. In August 1908, Church President Joseph F. Smith addressed speculation and gambling...
Post a Comment
Read

Mormonism and the Satanic Ritual Abuse Scare of the 1980s

       All right. So, for this post today, I’m going to be talking about a pretty sensitive subject. And that’s going to be satanic ritual abuse and potential ties to leadership of the Mormon church.      It should go without saying that this is going to be a little bit more of a sensitive subject. I’ll say up front that I have no intention of diving into specific examples—detailed descriptions of what satanic ritual abuse looks like—outside of broad definitions. My goal is just to give an idea of what makes ritual abuse a little bit different than regular abuse (for lack of a better word). Consider this your heads up that this is going to be a sensitive subject.      I typically wouldn’t really give this type of subject very much attention. I certainly never planned on making a post about it. But I did have an interesting conversation the other day with an LDS content creator that I message with sometimes. I was a little surprised whe...
Post a Comment
Read

John Corrill followed Joseph Smith for six years. This was his conclusion.

  John Corrill’s 1839 history is easy to quote as an anti-Mormon source. That misses what makes it useful. Corrill did not spend the early years of Joseph Smith’s movement standing outside it. He joined after trying to disprove it, defended the Saints against accusations he thought were false, served in church leadership, and eventually decided that the movement was a false religion. [1] [2] What changed his mind was a pattern which he had watched develop from the inside: failed plans, financial collapse, pressure against dissenters, escalating militancy, and promises of divine protection that always ended in disaster. [1] That makes Corrill’s story more useful than a simple hostile exposé. It records both why an intelligent early convert believed and why he later stopped believing. The complete 1839 text is available in the Lucifer’s Lantern Full Text Library, including Corrill’s own account of his conversion, church service, the Missouri conflict, and his final remarks to the S...
Post a Comment
Read