Skip to main content

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

Image
By Mason

 

 In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet.” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God.

1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything
 This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader.

2. The living prophet is more important than scripture
 Benson teaches that current revelation outweighs the Bible and other LDS texts. This means that if the prophet’s words contradict scripture, his words still carry the greater authority. Scripture becomes flexible while modern leadership becomes the final word.

3. The living prophet is more important than past prophets
 This principle allows present-day leaders to reverse or override earlier teachings without admitting error. Contradictions can be labeled as new revelation rather than as corrections to earlier doctrines. The past becomes adjustable whenever necessary.

4. The prophet will never lead the church astray
 This functions as a claim of practical infallibility. If the prophet cannot lead the church astray, then his direction is protected from criticism by definition. Members are encouraged to question themselves rather than question leadership.

5. The prophet does not need training or credentials to speak on any subject
 Revelation is treated as a substitute for expertise. The prophet can speak on politics, science, medicine, or any other field regardless of background or experience. This gives religious leaders influence in areas where factual knowledge should matter.

6. The prophet does not need to say “Thus saith the Lord”
 Anything said in an official setting can be treated as binding. There is no clear distinction between personal opinion and divine command. Members are expected to follow either one with the same level of trust.

7. The prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know
 This framing shifts responsibility away from leadership. If a teaching feels harsh or confusing, the assumption becomes that the member must adjust. Discomfort is treated as a sign of spiritual weakness rather than a reason to reconsider the message.

8. The prophet is not limited by human reasoning
 Reasoning and evidence take a lower position beneath revelation. If logic conflicts with prophetic statements, members are encouraged to rely on faith over analysis. This discourages thoughtful examination of teachings.

9. The prophet can receive revelation on any issue
 This includes spiritual doctrines, political questions, and practical decisions. Nothing is outside his jurisdiction. The scope of authority extends into every part of an individual’s life.

10. The prophet may involve himself in civic matters
 This principle supports political involvement and justifies public statements about laws and social issues. Members are taught to treat those statements as spiritually guided, which influences voting and civic behavior.

11. Those who struggle most are the proud who are learned or wealthy
 This portrays intellectual hesitation as pride. Education becomes suspect when it leads to questions. The principle encourages members to distrust critical thinking and view it as a barrier to faith.

12. The prophet will not be popular with the world
 This reinforces the idea that criticism is proof of righteousness. Pushback is framed as expected opposition rather than as a signal that something may be wrong. External dissent is interpreted as validation.

13. The prophet and his counselors form the First Presidency
 This strengthens the organizational hierarchy. The First Presidency sits at the top, and its decisions override those of any other governing body. Their collective voice shapes doctrine and policy for the entire church.

14. Follow the prophet and be blessed. Reject him and suffer
 The final principle presents obedience as the path to safety and disobedience as the path to suffering. It leaves no room for personal conscience or disagreement. Loyalty becomes the measure of righteousness.

What the Fundamentals Reveal

 Taken together, the 14 fundamentals create a system in which the prophet stands above scripture, tradition, personal revelation, and even common sense. They present obedience as a spiritual mandate and treat questioning as a sign of weakness or pride. Someone’s response to this structure depends on how they view authority, but the purpose of the fundamentals is clear. They are designed to place the prophet at the center of religious life and to ensure that his voice remains unquestioned within the church.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Temple Worthy?

By Mason
Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
5 comments
Read

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

By Mason
     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...
Post a Comment
Read

Is Mormonism a Cult?

By Mason
     The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes.       The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.      One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence: B ehavior I nformation T hought E motion.       Each form of control helps a system maintain stabil...
Post a Comment
Read

Code Names and Church Finances

By Mason
Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...
Post a Comment
Read