Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

 

 In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet.” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God.

1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything
 This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader.

2. The living prophet is more important than scripture
 Benson teaches that current revelation outweighs the Bible and other LDS texts. This means that if the prophet’s words contradict scripture, his words still carry the greater authority. Scripture becomes flexible while modern leadership becomes the final word.

3. The living prophet is more important than past prophets
 This principle allows present-day leaders to reverse or override earlier teachings without admitting error. Contradictions can be labeled as new revelation rather than as corrections to earlier doctrines. The past becomes adjustable whenever necessary.

4. The prophet will never lead the church astray
 This functions as a claim of practical infallibility. If the prophet cannot lead the church astray, then his direction is protected from criticism by definition. Members are encouraged to question themselves rather than question leadership.

5. The prophet does not need training or credentials to speak on any subject
 Revelation is treated as a substitute for expertise. The prophet can speak on politics, science, medicine, or any other field regardless of background or experience. This gives religious leaders influence in areas where factual knowledge should matter.

6. The prophet does not need to say “Thus saith the Lord”
 Anything said in an official setting can be treated as binding. There is no clear distinction between personal opinion and divine command. Members are expected to follow either one with the same level of trust.

7. The prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know
 This framing shifts responsibility away from leadership. If a teaching feels harsh or confusing, the assumption becomes that the member must adjust. Discomfort is treated as a sign of spiritual weakness rather than a reason to reconsider the message.

8. The prophet is not limited by human reasoning
 Reasoning and evidence take a lower position beneath revelation. If logic conflicts with prophetic statements, members are encouraged to rely on faith over analysis. This discourages thoughtful examination of teachings.

9. The prophet can receive revelation on any issue
 This includes spiritual doctrines, political questions, and practical decisions. Nothing is outside his jurisdiction. The scope of authority extends into every part of an individual’s life.

10. The prophet may involve himself in civic matters
 This principle supports political involvement and justifies public statements about laws and social issues. Members are taught to treat those statements as spiritually guided, which influences voting and civic behavior.

11. Those who struggle most are the proud who are learned or wealthy
 This portrays intellectual hesitation as pride. Education becomes suspect when it leads to questions. The principle encourages members to distrust critical thinking and view it as a barrier to faith.

12. The prophet will not be popular with the world
 This reinforces the idea that criticism is proof of righteousness. Pushback is framed as expected opposition rather than as a signal that something may be wrong. External dissent is interpreted as validation.

13. The prophet and his counselors form the First Presidency
 This strengthens the organizational hierarchy. The First Presidency sits at the top, and its decisions override those of any other governing body. Their collective voice shapes doctrine and policy for the entire church.

14. Follow the prophet and be blessed. Reject him and suffer
 The final principle presents obedience as the path to safety and disobedience as the path to suffering. It leaves no room for personal conscience or disagreement. Loyalty becomes the measure of righteousness.

What the Fundamentals Reveal

 Taken together, the 14 fundamentals create a system in which the prophet stands above scripture, tradition, personal revelation, and even common sense. They present obedience as a spiritual mandate and treat questioning as a sign of weakness or pride. Someone’s response to this structure depends on how they view authority, but the purpose of the fundamentals is clear. They are designed to place the prophet at the center of religious life and to ensure that his voice remains unquestioned within the church.

Check Your Understanding: 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet

Test what you remember about Ezra Taft Benson’s “14 Fundamentals” and how this article analyzes them.

1. What is the main focus of this article?




2. In what setting did Ezra Taft Benson originally present the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet”?




3. What is the first fundamental Benson lists?




4. How does the article describe the claim that the living prophet is more important than scripture?




5. How does the article interpret the idea that “the prophet will never lead the church astray”?




6. What concern does the article raise about the claim that the prophet does not need training or credentials?




7. According to the article, what is the effect of the idea that the prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know?




8. How does the article say the “proud who are learned or wealthy” framing affects members?




9. What is the concern about the teaching that the prophet “will not be popular with the world”?




10. Overall, how does the article say the 14 fundamentals shape the role of the prophet?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

Martinsburg Testimony Meeting Protest - Explained

A video from an LDS sacrament meeting in Martinsburg, West Virginia is once again making the rounds on social media. The footage shows two mothers interrupting a testimony meeting to warn fellow members that, in their view, local Church leaders had failed to protect children from a convicted child molester within their own congregation. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Brett Henry (@beardedrealtorutah) This event came after years of criminal proceedings, civil litigation, and allegations that Church leaders ignored warning signs while children continued to be abused. The case centered on Christopher Michael Jensen, who was sentenced in 2013 to 35 to 75 years in prison for sexually abusing two children, ages three and four. Court records also show that allegations against Jensen stretched back to 2004, when, at just 13 years old, he was arrested and charged with two felony counts involving the sexual abuse of two girls at his middle school. According...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...

Where Does the Book of Mormon Take Place?

I think we can all agree that the Book of Mormon is probably one of the most controversial publications ever produced. Every single aspect of it is debated. You have apologists who firmly believe the Book of Mormon is the word of God, that it is an ancient record of the ancient inhabitants of the Americas, and that it was given to Joseph Smith by an ancient American prophet named Moroni, who appeared as an angel. Or you have critics like myself who firmly believe that the Book of Mormon is a 19th century publication. But even beyond that, there are countless debates about the actual content of the book itself. One of the biggest is its historical setting. Where was the Book of Mormon actually supposed to take place? Some apologists and critics believe the narrative largely unfolded in North America , in places that would eventually become the United States. Others argue that it took place in S outh America or Central America. Historically, the LDS Church has even presented evidence t...

"Musket Fire" - a Response to Jeffery Holland

      On August 23, 2021, Jeffrey R. Holland stood before Brigham Young University’s faculty, staff, and administrators at the school’s annual University Conference in Provo, Utah. Holland was not merely a visiting Church leader. He was a former president of BYU, a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, and, at the time, chairman of the executive committee of the university’s Board of Trustees. His address, titled “ The Second Half of the Second Century of Brigham Young University, ” was presented as a reflection on BYU’s future and the religious mission that, in his view, must continue to distinguish it from other universities.     The full speech was shared by @byuspheeches      The timing could hardly have been more charged. That same day, BYU president Kevin Worthen announced the creation of a new Office of Belonging , intended to coordinate the university’s efforts to address prejudice and help marginalized members of the campus co...

Mormon Stories Fires Back: The Core Defenses Against the LDS Lawsuit

In April 2026, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its intellectual property arm, Intellectual Reserve, filed a federal lawsuit against the Open Stories Foundation and John Dehlin. The complaint alleges trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and consumer confusion arising from the use of the name Mormon Stories, its branding, and its use of Church-related images.      The Church portrays the case as a straightforward effort to protect its trademarks and prevent confusion among people seeking information about the faith. Mormon Stories sees the case very differently. In its response and counterclaim , the organization argues that the Church is attempting to claim ownership over a word that belongs to an entire religious movement while using intellectual property law against one of its most visible critics. Here are the major arguments at the center of the dispute.

John the Beloved is Investing in Bitcoin and AI

On a recent livestream, Shane Baldwin of Zion Media publicly recounted what he describes as one of the defining events of his life. According to Baldwin, he was visited by none other than John the Beloved while serving time in the Salt Lake County Jail where he was serving time for committing investment fraud . According to LDS belief, John remains alive today, continuing his ministry on the earth until the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. The belief comes primarily from an interpretation of John 21:20-23 and is expanded in the Mormon scripture of Doctrine and Covenants 7, which teaches that John requested the privilege of remaining on the earth to continue bringing souls to Christ until the Second Coming.  But John is not alone. The Book of Mormon also describes three disciples, commonly known as the Three Nephites, who were granted the same blessing. Together, these figures have become central to a long tradition of Mormon faith-promoting stories involving mysterious strangers who ...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

LDS Church Changes Temple Name Schedule

For decades, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who received their temple endowment on the same calendar day were given the same "new name." Since January 1, 1965, the name assigned to a patron has been determined almost entirely by two factors: their gender and the day of the month. A man endowed on the 12th of any month, for example, would receive the same name as every other man endowed on the 12th, regardless of the temple or country.  That system quietly changed in June 2026. According to the independently maintained Temple Name Oracle database , the Church has retained the same list of male and female names, but it no longer assigns them to fixed calendar dates. Instead, the names now follow a rotating sequence that changes each month. Male and female name pairs remain linked together, but the pair assigned on one date in June may appear on a different date in July.  The change means that simply knowing a person's endowment date is no longer ...
Link copied!