Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

 

 In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet.” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God.

1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything
 This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader.

2. The living prophet is more important than scripture
 Benson teaches that current revelation outweighs the Bible and other LDS texts. This means that if the prophet’s words contradict scripture, his words still carry the greater authority. Scripture becomes flexible while modern leadership becomes the final word.

3. The living prophet is more important than past prophets
 This principle allows present-day leaders to reverse or override earlier teachings without admitting error. Contradictions can be labeled as new revelation rather than as corrections to earlier doctrines. The past becomes adjustable whenever necessary.

4. The prophet will never lead the church astray
 This functions as a claim of practical infallibility. If the prophet cannot lead the church astray, then his direction is protected from criticism by definition. Members are encouraged to question themselves rather than question leadership.

5. The prophet does not need training or credentials to speak on any subject
 Revelation is treated as a substitute for expertise. The prophet can speak on politics, science, medicine, or any other field regardless of background or experience. This gives religious leaders influence in areas where factual knowledge should matter.

6. The prophet does not need to say “Thus saith the Lord”
 Anything said in an official setting can be treated as binding. There is no clear distinction between personal opinion and divine command. Members are expected to follow either one with the same level of trust.

7. The prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know
 This framing shifts responsibility away from leadership. If a teaching feels harsh or confusing, the assumption becomes that the member must adjust. Discomfort is treated as a sign of spiritual weakness rather than a reason to reconsider the message.

8. The prophet is not limited by human reasoning
 Reasoning and evidence take a lower position beneath revelation. If logic conflicts with prophetic statements, members are encouraged to rely on faith over analysis. This discourages thoughtful examination of teachings.

9. The prophet can receive revelation on any issue
 This includes spiritual doctrines, political questions, and practical decisions. Nothing is outside his jurisdiction. The scope of authority extends into every part of an individual’s life.

10. The prophet may involve himself in civic matters
 This principle supports political involvement and justifies public statements about laws and social issues. Members are taught to treat those statements as spiritually guided, which influences voting and civic behavior.

11. Those who struggle most are the proud who are learned or wealthy
 This portrays intellectual hesitation as pride. Education becomes suspect when it leads to questions. The principle encourages members to distrust critical thinking and view it as a barrier to faith.

12. The prophet will not be popular with the world
 This reinforces the idea that criticism is proof of righteousness. Pushback is framed as expected opposition rather than as a signal that something may be wrong. External dissent is interpreted as validation.

13. The prophet and his counselors form the First Presidency
 This strengthens the organizational hierarchy. The First Presidency sits at the top, and its decisions override those of any other governing body. Their collective voice shapes doctrine and policy for the entire church.

14. Follow the prophet and be blessed. Reject him and suffer
 The final principle presents obedience as the path to safety and disobedience as the path to suffering. It leaves no room for personal conscience or disagreement. Loyalty becomes the measure of righteousness.

What the Fundamentals Reveal

 Taken together, the 14 fundamentals create a system in which the prophet stands above scripture, tradition, personal revelation, and even common sense. They present obedience as a spiritual mandate and treat questioning as a sign of weakness or pride. Someone’s response to this structure depends on how they view authority, but the purpose of the fundamentals is clear. They are designed to place the prophet at the center of religious life and to ensure that his voice remains unquestioned within the church.

Check Your Understanding: 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet

Test what you remember about Ezra Taft Benson’s “14 Fundamentals” and how this article analyzes them.

1. What is the main focus of this article?




2. In what setting did Ezra Taft Benson originally present the “14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet”?




3. What is the first fundamental Benson lists?




4. How does the article describe the claim that the living prophet is more important than scripture?




5. How does the article interpret the idea that “the prophet will never lead the church astray”?




6. What concern does the article raise about the claim that the prophet does not need training or credentials?




7. According to the article, what is the effect of the idea that the prophet tells members what they need to know, not what they want to know?




8. How does the article say the “proud who are learned or wealthy” framing affects members?




9. What is the concern about the teaching that the prophet “will not be popular with the world”?




10. Overall, how does the article say the 14 fundamentals shape the role of the prophet?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...

The Church is Changing the Sunday Schedule... Again

On September 6, 2026, Latter-day Saints will arrive at church to find the second hour rearranged. Sacrament meeting will remain no longer than 60 minutes. Adults and youth will then attend 25 minutes of Sunday School every week, followed by 25 minutes of Relief Society, elders quorum, Young Women, or Aaronic Priesthood quorum instruction. Primary will meet for 55 minutes. The alternating schedule introduced with two-hour church in 2019 will be gone.¹ The First Presidency's March announcement put the change plainly: In the new schedule, sacrament meeting will continue to be no longer than 60 minutes. After a 5‑minute transition, youth and adults will attend a 25‑minute Sunday School class each week. Following another 5‑minute transition, they will attend a 25‑minute priesthood quorum, Relief Society, or Young Women meeting. Primary will continue to meet weekly and will now last 55 minutes.¹ The schedule is a modest administrative revision. The institution capable of making it, thoug...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

If Mormon Leaders Know the Church Is False, Why Do They Stay?

A recent r/exmormon post asked a question that comes up often in discussions of Mormonism: if senior leaders know about the historical problems surrounding Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, polygamy, translation, and other controversial subjects, why would they spend the rest of their lives defending the Church? [1] If these leaders know the Church is false, why would they dedicate their entire finite lives to it? by u/ImportantPerformer16 in exmormon The question is valid because the men at the top of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are not generally isolated from the institution they lead. Apostles serve full-time for the remainder of their lives, and the Church describes the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve as prophets, seers, revelators, and the body authorized to declare doctrine and establish policy. [2] But the question contains an assumption that should be separated from the evidence. We have good reason to believe senior leaders know that many ...

A Girl's Letters from Nauvoo.

On January 3, 1843, Charlotte Haven sat down in a small cottage overlooking the Mississippi and wrote to her parents in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. She had arrived in Nauvoo only days earlier to spend the winter with her brother Henderson and his wife, Elizabeth. Haven was not a Latter-day Saint. Her skepticism appears in the opening lines: [1] As I write Nauvoo, I look at the word with perfect amazement, and almost doubt my own senses when I find myself an inhabitant of this city of fanatics, for never did I expect to see the place, far less to indite letters to my dear parents from it. [1] Haven's letters appeared nearly forty-eight years later in the Overland Monthly under the title "A Girl's Letters from Nauvoo." They are openly critical and should be read as one outsider's testimony, not as a neutral transcript. Still, she recorded small details that official histories often leave out: the bitter cold, muddy streets, unfinished homes, crowded worship services,...

A Bit of Original Evidence

In May 1900, Theodore A. Schroeder published an article titled A Bit of Original Evidence  in issue no. 9 of Lucifer’s Lantern . [1] The piece reproduces part of an 1887 letter apparently written by Mississippi attorney E. E. Baldwin to W. O. Norrell of Salt Lake City. [1] [2] Baldwin attributed the story to his uncle by marriage, James G. Horton, who allegedly said that Joseph Smith and several companions staged the discovery of the Book of Mormon plates as a practical joke and used a Bible-shaped box packed with sand. [1] Other accounts conflict with the claim that the box contained only sand. William Smith stated that members of the Smith family felt the plates through the cloth covering them and could distinguish their individual leaves. Martin Harris reported that Alvah Beman heard a metallic sound when the plates were placed inside the box. Those who said they lifted the covered object also estimated that it weighed between forty and sixty pounds, which would be difficult ...

The Problem With Corbridge’s “You Will Stay” Argument

A short clip from Scripture Central’s current Stand Forever series has turned an old Lawrence E. Corbridge argument into a new controversy. In the clip, Corbridge says, “Darth Vader could be your bishop. The culture could be like Alcatraz,” and argues that a believer who sees the LDS Church as God’s kingdom will still stay.[1][4] The line is dramatic, but it isn’t the real issue. Corbridge’s argument is that bad leaders, painful culture, and even serious institutional failures do not decide whether someone should remain Mormon. The decisive question is whether the Church is true.[1] Corbridge’s framework works only if the Church’s truth is already treated as settled. Once that premise is granted, nearly any counterevidence can be classified as secondary, cultural, institutional, or simply something to endure. That makes the framework much better at preserving belief than evaluating whether the belief is warranted. The new video extends an older argument Corbridge’s new series takes it...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Visualization of the LDS Canon

Around the 1230s, Hugh of Saint-Cher and a team of Dominican scholars produced the first Bible concordance, working through the Latin Vulgate and recording where its words appeared. Because modern verse numbers did not yet exist, the compilers divided chapters into smaller lettered sections so readers could locate an occurrence. Printing made the method far more useful. John Marbeck published the first complete concordance to the English Bible in 1550 . Alexander Cruden's Complete Concordance followed in 1737 and became one of the best-known English Bible reference works. The basic structure remained familiar for centuries: choose a word, then receive a list of passages where it occurs. Latter-day Saints soon adopted the same approach for their own scriptures. In 1900, George Reynolds published A Complete Concordance to the Book of Mormon in Salt Lake City. The 852-page volume was the product of roughly twenty years of work and classified the words of the Book of Mormon so reade...