Skip to main content

[Satire] Church Leaders Warn About AI Use

Image
By Mason
The First Presidency released a formal statement this week addressing the use of artificial intelligence among members. The letter expresses concern that digital tools have already weakened personal testimony across the church, and that AI may increase the problem if members are not “spiritually careful” with how they use it.




According to the statement, leaders have watched a steady rise in faith crises that begin online. The document points to search engines, forums, and social media as the primary sources. AI is now categorized as “the next major risk,” since it can provide quick, direct answers that bypass official materials and approved explanations.

To counter this, members are encouraged to use AI only for what the letter calls “uplifting and faith supporting inquiry.” The statement defines this as asking questions that reinforce existing beliefs, assist in preparing devotionals, or help explain doctrines in a positive light. Leaders warn against asking AI anything related to historical controversies or conflicting accounts. Those topics are described as “easily distorted in ways that can mislead the inexperienced or spiritually unprepared.”

Several bishops and stake presidents, speaking anonymously, echoed the concerns. Many report a noticeable pattern. A member asks AI an open ended question about church history, receives an unexpected answer, and then schedules an urgent visit with leadership. One stake president said AI has become “a faster version of Google,” except members arrive with longer printouts and more precise citations.

The statement also addresses the growing trend of using AI to write sacrament meeting talks, lesson outlines, and family night messages. Leaders do not prohibit this, but they urge members to rely on outlines that follow official manuals and approved doctrinal summaries. Anything outside that scope is discouraged because it may contain “subtle framing or unfamiliar language.”

The document ends by reminding members that spiritual confirmation comes through prayer and scripture study, not algorithmic response. Still, AI is permitted as a tool for “faithful learning” as long as members focus on questions that strengthen belief rather than challenge it.

 In recent years, the internet has influenced the spiritual well being of many members throughout the world. Leaders have observed an increase in challenges to personal testimony that originate from unverified online sources. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, these concerns have grown. This technology can produce information quickly, confidently, and without regard for accuracy or spiritual guidance.

Church Statement

 We encourage members of the Church to use artificial intelligence in a responsible and faith supporting manner. AI should be treated as a tool that can assist in learning, teaching, and organizing, but not as a source of doctrinal clarification or historical interpretation. When members seek answers to complex questions, they should rely on scripture, prophetic counsel, and approved Church materials.

 Members are advised to avoid using AI for inquiries that involve past controversies, disputed events, or topics that require careful spiritual framing. These areas are easily distorted by automated systems. Such distortion can lead to confusion, discouragement, or misunderstanding. Questions that relate to Church doctrine, Church history, or prophetic authority should be studied through official channels.

 AI may be used to assist with tasks such as preparing talks, creating outlines, and organizing teaching materials, provided the member begins with approved resources and stays within the bounds of established doctrine. Leaders counsel against relying on AI generated explanations that introduce unfamiliar interpretations, unusual terminology, or argumentative reasoning.

 The Church affirms that testimony comes through prayer, obedience, and sincere study of revealed truth. Artificial intelligence cannot replace the Holy Ghost. We invite all members to approach new digital tools with caution, humility, and a desire to remain anchored in faith. Members who seek understanding are encouraged to speak with their local leaders and continue to build their foundation upon spiritual confirmation rather than automated response.
 
What Critics are Saying

Reactions to the statement have begun circulating among former members, scholars, and active Latter day Saints who follow Church policy closely. Many critics argue that the guidance reflects a long standing concern about information that cannot be controlled through official channels. They see the document as an attempt to manage how members search for answers rather than address the underlying issues that keep surfacing in online discussions.

Several researchers in Mormon studies say the statement frames AI as a threat because it delivers fast, direct responses that do not filter through correlated material. They point out that the same questions have been asked for decades. The only difference is that members can now access large amounts of information in seconds. For these critics, the problem is not the technology. It is the tension between the historical record and the narrative members are taught.

Some active members have voiced frustration that the statement encourages only faith reinforcing questions. They say this creates an environment where difficult topics cannot be approached honestly. A few have noted that the Church’s insistence on “careful spiritual framing” sounds like another way of discouraging independent study.

Others argue that limiting what members can ask an AI reflects the  pattern of discouraging open inquiry. They believe the policy signals anxiety about losing control of the conversation. According to these voices, the internet has already reshaped how members learn about their own religion. AI will only accelerate that shift.

While the official statement calls for caution and humility, critics say the deeper issue is trust. They argue that if faith depends on restricting certain questions, then the policy reveals more about institutional insecurity than technological risk.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Temple Worthy?

By Mason
Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
5 comments
Read

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

By Mason
     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...
Post a Comment
Read

Is Mormonism a Cult?

By Mason
     The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes.       The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.      One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence: B ehavior I nformation T hought E motion.       Each form of control helps a system maintain stabil...
Post a Comment
Read

Are Mormons Christian?

By Mason
People keep asking whether Mormons are Christian, as if that’s the issue that matters. It’s not. Mormons love this question since its probably one of the tamest aspects of the faith to question. The other day I was reading some comments on an online post that was debating the issue of whether or not Mormons were Christian, and this interaction caught my eye. One individual declared that the FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) “never were and never will be Mormon.”  Now, I can't imagine that many Mormons will share this same sentiment, considering that the FLDS church literally emerged from the exact same roots as the Utah church. But this interaction ironically demonstrates the exact same mindset that other Christians have about Mormons. Some Christians don’t consider Mormons Christian because Latter-day Saint teachings reject key doctrines established by early Christian creeds, like the Trinity, original sin, and the belief that Go...
Post a Comment
Read