Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Stand Forever: A Response




In response to my thoughts regarding the 2013 study on the LDS Faith Crisis, I had someone suggest that I read a talk by Lawrence E Corbridge.


After a quick Google search, I found the talk they were referring to and wanted to share some thoughts on it.

Here is the relevent exerpt from Corbridge's 2022 BYU devotional:

----------
Primary Questions and Secondary Questions:

Begin by answering the primary questions. There are primary questions and there are secondary questions. Answer the primary questions first. Not all questions are equal and not all truths are equal. The primary questions are the most important. Everything else is subordinate. There are only a few primary questions. I will mention four of them.

1. Is there a God who is our Father?

2. Is Jesus Christ the Son of God, the Savior of the world?

3. Was Joseph Smith a prophet?

4. Is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints the kingdom of God on the earth?

By contrast, the secondary questions are unending. They include questions about Church history, polygamy, people of African descent and the priesthood, women and the priesthood, how the Book of Mormon was translated, the Pearl of Great Price, DNA and the Book of Mormon, gay marriage, the different accounts of the First Vision, and on and on.

Source: Lawrence E. Corbridge, Stand Forever, January 22 2019
https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/lawrence-e-corbridge/stand-for-ever/
 ----------

Okay... Wow. 
That is a lot to take in.

Upon reading his remarks, I immediately found the video footage and shared it on social media to gauge a general response. 

And I have to say, some of the comments absolutely hit the nail on the head with what the issues within this talk were.

This approach, presented by Corbridge, creates a false dichotomy between what it deems "primary" and "secondary" questions, which diminishes the importance of historical and doctrinal evidence in forming a coherent belief system. 

Here's why:

1. Primary and Secondary Questions Are Interconnected

His approach assumes that "primary" questions can be answered in isolation, independent of the "secondary" questions. However, many of the so-called secondary questions—such as those about polygamy, DNA and the Book of Mormon, and the different accounts of the First Vision—directly impact the credibility of the "primary" claims. For example:

If Joseph Smith is claimed to be a prophet, but historical evidence about polygamy or the translation of the Book of Mormon calls his actions or claims into question, it undermines the ability to affirm that primary question.

The truthfulness of the Church’s claims about being God’s kingdom on Earth hinges on the accuracy of its historical narratives and the morality of its practices.

Ignoring these interconnected issues suggests a willingness to base belief on incomplete or contradictory information, which undermines the pursuit of truth.


2. Truth Is Not Hierarchical

The argument implies that some truths are more important than others, but it does not explain why certain questions are elevated to "primary" status. For example:

Why should one conclude that Joseph Smith was a prophet without critically evaluating the historical and doctrinal claims associated with him, which are categorized as "secondary"?

If the "secondary" questions reveal contradictions, moral problems, or factual inaccuracies, they naturally call the "primary" conclusions into doubt.

Truth is holistic, and all questions must be weighed and considered because they collectively inform the validity of any religious claim.

3. Avoiding Difficult Questions Undermines Faith

This framework can encourage adherents to ignore difficult or uncomfortable questions by labeling them as "secondary" or "less important." However, faith built on avoiding scrutiny can feel fragile. For example:

A person might accept that Joseph Smith was a prophet, but if they later encounter well-documented issues like the Kinderhook Plates hoax, the evolving accounts of the First Vision, or the lack of archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, their faith could be severely shaken. Thus challenging the "primary" question.

By discouraging critical engagement with these issues, the framework fosters a brittle faith rather than one rooted in thorough understanding.


Authentic belief is strengthened by wrestling with all questions, not just the ones that seem convenient or easy to answer.


4. It Creates an Arbitrary Standard

The categorization of questions into "primary" and "secondary" is arbitrary and subjective. Who decides which questions are primary and which are secondary? For someone deeply affected by issues like polygamy or LGBTQ+ teachings, those questions might feel as "primary" as the four listed. For example:

A person grappling with the Church's historical treatment of marginalized groups may find it difficult to reconcile the idea of the Church as "the kingdom of God on Earth" if those issues remain unresolved.

Elevating certain questions over others may reflect institutional priorities rather than an objective approach to truth.

5. A Lack of Transparency Reduces Credibility

By classifying challenging historical and doctrinal issues to the category of "secondary," the framework can come across as evasive or dismissive. People seeking truth often value transparency and integrity in addressing difficult questions. This approach can feel like an attempt to shield believers from inconvenient truths, which undermines the credibility of the organization promoting it.

A more honest and comprehensive approach would acknowledge that all questions—whether about God's existence, the role of Jesus, or Church history—are relevant to the pursuit of truth. Faith that is informed by rigorous inquiry and open to examining difficult issues is more resilient and trustworthy than faith built on avoiding or dismissing critical questions.

Ultimately, truth is robust enough to withstand scrutiny, and no question should be deemed unimportant in the search for it.

-Mason






----------

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you remember the key ideas from this post.

1. When was Lawrence E. Corbridge’s “Stand Forever” devotional delivered?




2. How many “primary questions” does Corbridge identify?




3. Which of the following is one of Corbridge’s “primary questions”?




4. According to the author, why can’t “secondary questions” be dismissed?




5. What is one of the author's central critiques of Corbridge’s framing?




6. What concern does the author raise about avoiding “secondary” issues?




7. Why does the author call the primary/secondary distinction arbitrary?




8. Why might dismissing difficult historical issues damage credibility?




9. What role do “secondary questions” play, according to the author?




10. What belief about truth does the author express at the end of the post?




Looking for reading suggestions?

Check out my growing list


Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...
3 comments
Read

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...
1 comment
Read

A Bit of Original Evidence

In May 1900, Theodore A. Schroeder published an article titled A Bit of Original Evidence  in issue no. 9 of Lucifer’s Lantern . [1] The piece reproduces part of an 1887 letter apparently written by Mississippi attorney E. E. Baldwin to W. O. Norrell of Salt Lake City. [1] [2] Baldwin attributed the story to his uncle by marriage, James G. Horton, who allegedly said that Joseph Smith and several companions staged the discovery of the Book of Mormon plates as a practical joke and used a Bible-shaped box packed with sand. [1] Other accounts conflict with the claim that the box contained only sand. William Smith stated that members of the Smith family felt the plates through the cloth covering them and could distinguish their individual leaves. Martin Harris reported that Alvah Beman heard a metallic sound when the plates were placed inside the box. Those who said they lifted the covered object also estimated that it weighed between forty and sixty pounds, which would be difficult ...
Post a Comment
Read

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

The Church is Changing the Sunday Schedule... Again

On September 6, 2026, Latter-day Saints will arrive at church to find the second hour rearranged. Sacrament meeting will remain no longer than 60 minutes. Adults and youth will then attend 25 minutes of Sunday School every week, followed by 25 minutes of Relief Society, elders quorum, Young Women, or Aaronic Priesthood quorum instruction. Primary will meet for 55 minutes. The alternating schedule introduced with two-hour church in 2019 will be gone.¹ The First Presidency's March announcement put the change plainly: In the new schedule, sacrament meeting will continue to be no longer than 60 minutes. After a 5‑minute transition, youth and adults will attend a 25‑minute Sunday School class each week. Following another 5‑minute transition, they will attend a 25‑minute priesthood quorum, Relief Society, or Young Women meeting. Primary will continue to meet weekly and will now last 55 minutes.¹ The schedule is a modest administrative revision. The institution capable of making it, thoug...
Post a Comment
Read

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
6 comments
Read

Don't Be a Sea Lion

Religious arguments online tend to follow a familiar pattern. Someone makes a claim. Another person asks a question. An answer is given, but the questioner does not really engage with it. They ask for another source, then another explanation, then proof of some smaller point buried inside the original answer. Every response produces three new questions. When the other person finally becomes irritated or leaves, the questioner declares victory. “I was only asking questions.” “Why are you afraid of a civil discussion?” “If your position were true, you should be able to defend it.” This behavior is often called sea lioning. It looks like curiosity, but functions as harassment. It uses the language of calm discussion without accepting the responsibilities of an honest one. Religious believers do it. Critics of religion do it. Apologists, atheists, pastors, ex-believers, missionaries, and anonymous accounts do it...  No position has a monopoly on good faith. The name itself comes from D...
Post a Comment
Read

What Would It Take to Show Christianity Is False?

If Christianity's central claims are correct, then the universe has a creator who became incarnate in Jesus of Nazareth, died for the sins of the world, rose bodily from the dead, and continues to offer eternal life to those who trust in him. If these claims are true, they deserve not merely admiration but allegiance. They would represent the defining events of human history. If they are false, however, the implications are equally profound. Christianity has shaped civilizations, inspired art, influenced governments, comforted the dying, motivated charity, justified wars, and guided the lives of billions of people. A religion with that kind of influence should not simply be accepted because it is ancient or widely believed. It should be examined with the same seriousness its claims demand. C. S. Lewis understood this point perhaps better than anyone. Although remembered as one of Christianity's most influential defenders, he famously observed in God in the Dock: Essays on Theol...
1 comment
Read

Caring for the Poor Has Been Low on the Mormon Priority List

We can't deny that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints provides millions of dollars each year in humanitarian aide, and that many members serve generously. But this aide is pennies compared to what the church spends on temples, their stock portfolio and real estate collections. Which begs the question, where does humanitarian work rank in the Church’s own mission? For decades, Church leaders defined that mission around preaching, ordinances, and salvation. By the Church’s own messaging, caring for the poor has historically been one of the Church's lowest institutional priorities. 1936 to 1981: Welfare was meant to build character During the Great Depression, the First Presidency tied welfare to work, independence, thrift, and self-respect. The goal was to help people provide for themselves. In 1936, J. Reuben Clark said that the welfare system had one primary goal: building character , an idea in which he repeated again in 1981. The real long-term objective of th...
Post a Comment
Read

If Mormon Leaders Know the Church Is False, Why Do They Stay?

A recent r/exmormon post asked a question that comes up often in discussions of Mormonism: if senior leaders know about the historical problems surrounding Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, polygamy, translation, and other controversial subjects, why would they spend the rest of their lives defending the Church? [1] If these leaders know the Church is false, why would they dedicate their entire finite lives to it? by u/ImportantPerformer16 in exmormon The question is valid because the men at the top of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are not generally isolated from the institution they lead. Apostles serve full-time for the remainder of their lives, and the Church describes the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve as prophets, seers, revelators, and the body authorized to declare doctrine and establish policy. [2] But the question contains an assumption that should be separated from the evidence. We have good reason to believe senior leaders know that many ...
Post a Comment
Read