Skip to main content

Without the Mormon Lens: 1 - Introduction

 "I don't think Joseph Smith was a prophet"

    Tears that I had been holding back finally broke free as I said the words I never thought I would say. The fear, the anger, the betrayal. The emotions that countless people who have lost their faith had felt, were rushing through me. I collapsed to the floor as this great realization washed over me.

    I  had lost my faith. 

    It was gone.

    I don't feel that it is important to share the events that led to my faith crisis, and honestly they are hard to explain. Like most people who leave the church, there were a number of issues that had piled up over the years. Items that were stacked on my shelf of concerns eventually became too much for the shelf to handle. It broke, and with it, my world shattered.

    The grief was overwhelming. I had known nothing but Mormonism for my entire life, and the loss was the feeling of losing a loved one. An entire half of myself, a huge part of my identity... vanished.

    My wife was kind and understanding. She had patiently waited for me to return from my mission, and at my request, had become baptized as a member of the church. Although she was never truly converted, she knew what the gospel meant to me. And for her love and support, I will always be grateful.

    Time passed and I had slowly become more accustomed to no longer calling myself a Mormon. I had been through therapy, had gotten my anger out on some online forums, and felt that I was in a good place.

    However, one day I was going through my storage unit when I came across my box of memorabilia from my mission. I don't really know why I kept it. I had thrown my garments away the summer before, and had thrown away all anything else related to the church as well. For whatever reason I still had this box. I opened it up to find my copy of Preach My Gospel, the Standard Works, some other odds and ends, and... a few copies of the pamphlets we used in discussions. 

    I stared for a moment at a copy of a booklet that taught the Plan of Salvation. I knew it well. I had taught that lesson countless times. But staring at it now, it felt foreign to me. I thumbed through the pages as the pit in my stomach grew. I recognized the pictures, I remembered all of the words. But they meant nothing to me.

    I thought back to a time as a missionary when I had stumbled across a tract left behind by a Jehovah's Witness. I thumbed through those pages back then and felt the same nothingness that I felt now. The art that mattered to someone else, was just another painting of Jesus. The lessons that changed someone's life were just words on a page. For the first time since walking away I was faced with an uncomfortable reality. 

    I had lost my Mormon lens. 

    I  could not see the church in the same way that I did as a member. 

    Now, I don't know why this little book triggered this thought. I had stood off to the side during Sunday dinners and watched while everyone bowed their heads to pray. I had attended baby blessings and spent time with Mormon friends despite no longer attending their ward. All of which required a mental disconnect to keep family and friend relationships going. But this? This was personal. This was me, standing alone in the back corner of a storage unit, face to face with a past I had walked away from.

    I have thought often about this moment, and have acknowledged the feelings any time they arise. It breaks my heart to know that I am not alone in this feeling. Countless people lose their Mormon lens, their reality has changed, and there wasn't anything I could do about it.

    Eventually I started posting on social media in an effort to make content that is relatable to those of us who leave. I enjoy it, and I am comforted in knowing that I am helping others come to terms with this new world view, even if some don't see it that way.

    I've been thinking about the Mormon lens for a while now, and its in the back of my mind when I make my posts on Instagram. I try not to feel hurt when members of the church don't see things the same way that those who left do. Why would they? They still see the world from the eyes of a Mormon, I see it through the eyes as someone who walked away.

    I have decided to take one more step in my journey outside the church. I am going to study the Book of Mormon one last time. From beginning to end. Not from the eyes of a believing member of the church, but as someone who now sees with a different perspective. I love the Book of Mormon, but I cannot make myself see it as the work of God. 

    I started this study a few weeks ago and feel strongly that I need to share my findings and my perspectives to the public sphere. I currently have finished my own analysis of the First Book of Nephi and feel confident in saying that it is nothing but a product of the time, and that Joseph Smith was a talented storyteller. 

    This brief post serves as an introduction of sorts to this project.  As much as I want to jump right in, I will be sharing one or two additional posts leading up to the actual content of the Book of Mormon. It is important to me that I present the book in the literary sphere that  I believe it exists in. Not as scripture, but as a historical fiction, brought about by the interests of Joseph Smith's time. That takes some time to explain and my message will be lost if I don't

    It is my hope that I will be able to present a new perspective of the Book of Mormon in a way that can help those of you who may still be wondering how it was possible, and where the words came from. I may not have the answers to everything, but I am making every attempt to be thorough, yet honest in my thoughts and conclusions. 

    Its entirely possible that I will reach a dead end, and call it a loss. But we'll cross that bridge when we get there.

    At this point I'm just rambling. So until next time, I bid you Adios

-Mason




- Next Post - 

2 - Changing our Perspective

The idea that deconstruction begins with an openness to fresh perspective, a different lens.


    


Comments

  1. Great post, thank you for sharing. That grief is overwhelming. It’s a death and a rebirth and it’s devastating and wonderful at the same time. Looking forward to more posts!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your registration alive .” He...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...

Code Names and Church Finances

Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Link copied!