Skip to main content

Without the Mormon Lens: 2 - Changing Our Perspective

     Upon first leaving the church, I didn't have any real explanation to give people for why the religion was "false." I had questions, but I felt that I had no answers.

   As a faithful member, I had done my best to steer away from "anti" material. Most items on my shelf stemmed from personal observations and experiences. It took me several months after leaving before I even sat down to read the CES Letter. It seemed backwards to only pursue the material after I decided to leave the church. Somehow it felt wrong. Most people read the letter and then leave... right?

     I began posting some of my experiences on reddit (under a different username) as a way to vent to others and to find a new sense of community. At one point I shared this sentiment, that I felt unjustified in a way for how I came to the conclusion to leave. I quickly found that many... many... people experienced what I had experienced. The loss of faith, which was then followed by reading contrary material.

      In the Mormon lens, we saw people who were converted as being someone who had be adequately humbled or prepared. It's the reason missionaries are asked to seek out people who had recently faced a major life change. 

A death in the family.
A new child.
A new marriage.

    The reality is that people by nature are more open to change when life is changing around them. People join religions and leave religions in response to the events in their life and the state mind that they are in. They seek what resonates with them in that moment, what makes them feel in control. 

    For a time, I felt that the letter had done it's job. It had given me answers to a few questions, had given me a resource to send people, and had provided a sort of authoritative voice to back up my position. I felt in control.

    One afternoon I was spending some time with a friend of mine, who had also left the church several years prior. We had a few drinks and as always, starting talking about the church. He was working on obtaining a PHD in Psychology and was writing his thesis on the impact of high demand religions in childhood. This mutual interest in the church and it's impact on those who leave always left us with plenty to discuss. 

    We began discussing our faith crises with each other and the conversation quickly turned to the CES Letter. My friend looked at me and said, "I was out the minute I saw that map."

    I knew immediately what map he was referring to. On page 13, the author Jeremy Runnells had drawn a comparison showing the landmarks surrounding Joseph Smith and compared it to locations as described in the Book of Mormon.
     
    Is that all it took? To see a familiar story in a different perspective? What made the map effect him when plenty of believing members have seen it as well and shrugged it away? Was he too hasty in his decision? Maybe, maybe not. The fact remains that once he saw it, he couldn't unsee it. His Mormon lens was gone. For whatever reason, that moment forward, the church and the Book of Mormon just weren't the same in his eyes. 

    I'll never know why the 12 pages before didn't persuade him while the map did. Its likely that he himself wouldn't have an answer. Maybe he had been sufficiently humbled or prepared in some way to accept this new view. The conversation took it's natural course to other topics and we never revisited the subject again. But the statement he made keeps coming up in my mind.

"I was out the minute I saw that map."

     New perspective changes everything. Facts mean nothing to someone who hasn't experienced a shift in their perspective, or is at least willing to change. But how do we convince someone that the Book of Mormon isn't an ancient record? How do we demonstrate that it was most likely the product of an imaginative mind? If someone isn't in a place where they are willing to see it through your eyes, is it even possible?

    With these questions in mind, I set out to find the source material for the book. Knowing that I needed to understand where it came from. Much like Russell and his maps, I needed to be able to visually show the text as something other than ancient.

     Not an easy task, I know. It's been a subject of debate even when it existed as just a manuscript. Entire books have been written on the very subject, both for and against its divinity. Nevertheless, I figured that my best bet was to go back in time and find sources as close to Joseph Smith as I could. 

     I spent countless hours pouring through old books on the Internet Archive, was up till the early hours of the morning perusing Uncle Dale's Early Mormon Articles. Obsessively reading anything and everything I could put my hands on. I didn't know exactly what I was looking for, but I would know it when I saw it. 

    Finally, I stumbled across a small newspaper column that had been digitized and shared on NYS Historic Newspapers. Published on October 5th 1825 in the Oxford Gazzette, the story of a family arriving in America is told in a biblical style. It was titled "Chronicles - Chap. 1" 


 
 It felt so familiar that I was certain I was on to something big. I went through the story piece by piece and aligned it with what I saw in Nephi. The similarities were incredible. Was this it? Did I have the answer?

    And then... I had nothing. The comparison fell apart. As far as I could recall, the Book Mormon said nothing about Bully the Beef-man or Francis the Fiddler. I felt a bit discouraged here. But the fact that there were so many similarities (up until the last half) still bothered me. Who were these people? What was it about?

    Clearly this short article was a satire of some real events. A humorous retelling of a very real history. The best I could find is the possibly that it was a story of colonizers that fled to America during the Jacobite rising of 1745. But even then, I'm unsure.  The names and events that may have been known to the original audience may have possibly been lost to time. 

     However, it got me thinking, maybe I wasn't too far off base. What if the Book of Mormon was written with a similar premise. That it was a narrative that retold other stories in American history in a different light. Is there further justification for this idea? Could I find more examples of American history beyond this short column? Was there more to it than Runnells' map? I soon discovered that the answer to that question would be yes.

     In my next post I will be discussing the literary world of pseudo-biblical works and how they paved the way for the Book of Mormon. From there, we can dive more into the text of the book and break it down piece by piece in much more detail than my initial findings with Chronicles.

    If you've read this far, I thank you for hanging in there and allowing me to set the stage a bit. I appreciate your support of this project and wish you the best.

-Mason

----------

"When an honestly mistaken man sees the truth, one of two things happens: (1) he will either cease to be mistaken, or (2) he will cease to be honest. For he will either accept the truth or he will reject it. If he accepts it, he is no longer mistaken; if he rejects it, he is no longer honest. It is as simple as that. There cannot be such a thing as an “honestly mistaken man” who has once seen the truth." 

- Fanning Yater Tant


- Next Post -

3 - And it Came to Pass

We discuss the Chronicle of the Kings of England


New here? Consider starting at the first post.



  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...
Post a Comment
Read

Is Mormonism a Cult?

     The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes.       The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.      One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence: B ehavior I nformation T hought E motion.       Each form of control helps a system maintain stabil...
Post a Comment
Read

Are Mormons Christian?

People keep asking whether Mormons are Christian, as if that’s the issue that matters. It’s not. Mormons love this question since its probably one of the tamest aspects of the faith to question. The other day I was reading some comments on an online post that was debating the issue of whether or not Mormons were Christian, and this interaction caught my eye. One individual declared that the FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) “never were and never will be Mormon.”  Now, I can't imagine that many Mormons will share this same sentiment, considering that the FLDS church literally emerged from the exact same roots as the Utah church. But this interaction ironically demonstrates the exact same mindset that other Christians have about Mormons. Some Christians don’t consider Mormons Christian because Latter-day Saint teachings reject key doctrines established by early Christian creeds, like the Trinity, original sin, and the belief that Go...
Post a Comment
Read

A Covenant People - 1: Magnalia Christi Americana

There is a very distinct moral rhythm that drives the entire storyline of the Book of Mormon. This is often referred to within the church as the “pride cycle.”    It goes something like this: When the people remember God, they live peacefully and prosper. Their obedience brings material success and national stability. Then, wealth and comfort begin to shift their focus. Pride replaces gratitude. The people start to divide into social classes, persecute the poor, and boast of their own strength. As pride spreads, the society grows corrupt. Prophets warn them to repent, but their voices are ignored or mocked. Eventually, destruction comes through war, famine, or internal collapse. Suffering drives the people to humility. They remember God again, repent, and the Lord blesses them with peace and prosperity. Then the cycle restarts. This pattern is repeated continually from the beginning of the Book of Mormon and is claimed to be the direct result of covenant with God. That when m...
Post a Comment
Read