Skip to main content

Featured

Primary Questions: A Response

In response to my thoughts regarding the 2013 study on the LDS Faith Crisis , I had someone suggest that I read a talk by Lawrence E Corbridge. After a quick Google search, I found the talk they were referring to and wanted to share some thoughts on it. Here is the relevent exerpt from Corbridge's 2022 BYU devotional: ---------- Primary Questions and Secondary Questions: Begin by answering the primary questions. There are primary questions and there are secondary questions. Answer the primary questions first. Not all questions are equal and not all truths are equal. The primary questions are the most important. Everything else is subordinate. There are only a few primary questions. I will mention four of them. 1. Is there a God who is our Father? 2. Is Jesus Christ the Son of God, the Savior of the world? 3. Was Joseph Smith a prophet? 4. Is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints the kingdom of God on the earth? By contrast, the secondary questions are unending...

Without the Mormon Lens: 3 - And it Came to Pass

     As I discussed in my previous post, my theory is that the Book of Mormon is a psuedo-biblical historical fiction. I believe that it is a work which was influenced by other writings in this genre and the history of America.

    In order to explore this concept a little more, we need to first understand how widespread these types of works were in the United States. And in order to do that, we need to first go to London, where psuedo-biblicia first captured the public's attention.

     In 1740, Robert Dodsley published a book telling the history of the Kings of England in a biblical style, or "the manner of The Jewish Historians." It was published in multiple editions and spread quickly to the United States.

Cover page from the 1821 edition

     The book quickly gained notoriety for its unique approach to retelling English history. It was designed to mock the grandiosity and style of biblical texts while recounting the history of England's kings, which gave it a distinctive and enduring appeal. It has been described in modern critiques as a "most successful" example of blending historical narrative with satire.

   I'll share some content from the Book below (the 1821 edition) to give you an idea of the style that Dodsely adopted.

Introduction to Richard II

Excerpt about Edward the First

The Commonwealth 

The Commonwealth continued...


     The book was even reprinted in an "enlarged version" specifically for young readers.

Cover Page from the  1799 Enlarged Version

Introduction to Richard II

Excerpt from Henry V

Excerpt from Anne

     You get the idea. It's history, but it's presented as biblical. This type of writing has been given multiple names. Including the style of antiquity, biblical style, King James style, etc... I encompass all of into the term "psuedo-biblical." Because it looks biblical, it sounds biblical... but it isn't.

    Following the success of the work and others in England and in the States, we see a huge influx of psuedo-biblical works begin to flood newspapers around the country. Similar to the one I shared in my previous post. There were so many in fact, that attempting to interpret all of them or even read all of them would take significantly more effort than one person could devote. Here are several examples from newspapers around the country.





    Those three articles are very brief examples, a simple search for "and it came to pass" or other similar phrases on the Chronicling America website, or other databases, will give you an idea of just how many of these there are. You will find (in addition to regular biblical verses) news, fictional stories, satire, history and more. These are found in nearly every newspaper I have searched through in nearly every state. 

    It should come as no surprise that, despite copywrite laws, the Book of Mormon itself was partially published in a Palmyra newspaper by Abner Cole (under the pseudonym Obadiah Dogberry Esq.)