Skip to main content

Reading Church History - An Ex-Mormon Response to Dallin H. Oaks

Image
By Mason

 


Dallin H. Oaks’s talk “Reading Church History” reflects a defensive stance toward the discipline of history. Rather than encouraging open historical inquiry, Oaks frames church history as something to be read through faith, not skepticism. 

He warns against what he calls “secular” or “critical” readings that might lead believers to doubt prophetic authority. His argument assumes that divine purpose supersedes historical context and that imperfect records should not shake testimony. There are several issues with his approach.

1. Scientific Uncertainties

Oaks opens by discussing how media coverage around church history can be unreliable because of incomplete scientific evidence—clearly referring to the Mark Hofmann forgery scandal then unfolding. He warns against assuming early reports are accurate. Fair point. The irony is that he was right for the wrong reasons: Hofmann’s documents were forgeries, but his warning served more to defend the church than to protect truth.

2. Lack of Context

He argues that news media often fail to include context and therefore distort history. Again, true to an extent. But it’s used here to tell members that secular reporting about the church can’t be trusted—a theme that repeats throughout.

3. Truths and Half-Truths

Oaks warns that Satan spreads half-truths mixed with lies. Then he says, “Some things that are true are not edifying or appropriate to communicate.” In other words, even true history can be wrong to share if it isn’t “faith-promoting.” This is the same man who just said telling half-truths is Satanic. The contradiction speaks for itself.

4. Bias

He tells listeners to watch for bias—religious or irreligious—and implies that critical books by supposed “faithful” members may be deceitful. He quotes Joseph Smith: “It is in vain to try to hide a bad spirit from the eyes of them who are spiritual.”
In practice, this means any member who questions the church can be dismissed as having “a bad spirit.” Critics are automatically liars, no matter what evidence they bring.

5. Balance

Here’s the famous line again:

“Balance is not to be expected in either official Mormon or avowedly anti-Mormon literature.”

The problem? He then says only objective sources should be trusted—but also warns that those pretending to be objective may secretly be anti-Mormon. So what’s left? Church-approved material, which he just said isn’t balanced. It’s a perfect loop that keeps believers inside the church’s information bubble.

He compares criticism of Joseph Smith’s treasure-digging to bringing up a general’s childhood shoplifting—implying it’s irrelevant. But it’s not. Smith’s treasure-seeking methods directly tie to how he claimed to translate the Book of Mormon.

6. Evaluation

Oaks ends by telling members to pray about what they read. Fair enough—until he adds that “the Spirit of the Lord will not guide us if our attitude is one of fault-finding.” Then he quotes Jude 8: “Evil speaking of the Lord’s anointed is in a class by itself.”

He concludes that even if criticism of church leaders is true, it’s still wrong to share. That’s the key message: loyalty over truth.

Final Thoughts

If you’ve ever been told not to read something “anti-Mormon,” this talk explains why. Oaks teaches members that all criticism comes from Satan, that truth can be harmful, and that even verified facts about leaders should be silenced if they weaken faith.

If you think I’ve misrepresented him, the full 45-minute talk is linked below. Listen for yourself. But don’t forget his own rule: “Balance is not to be expected in official Mormon literature.”

Links to resources:




Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand the main critiques of Oaks’s approach to church history.

1. What is the central argument of this article about Oaks’s talk?




2. How does the article interpret Oaks’s warnings about scientific uncertainty?




3. According to the article, how does Oaks use the idea of “bias”?




4. What contradiction does the article highlight in Oaks’s statements about truth?




5. Why does the article say Oaks’s comparison about Joseph Smith’s treasure digging is flawed?




6. What loop does the article say Oaks creates when discussing sources?




7. According to the article, what is Oaks’s final message about criticism of leaders?




8. What does the article claim Oaks’s framework ultimately reinforces?




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your registration alive .” He...
3 comments
Read

Are You Temple Worthy?

By Mason
Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
6 comments
Read

Code Names and Church Finances

By Mason
Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Post a Comment
Read
Link copied!