Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Every Mormon Should Read Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts.

Image
By Mason

 



I would probably say that the Book of Mormon is one of the most heavily criticized pieces of literature ever put into circulation. These criticisms go back even before it was published. From the moment Joseph Smith claimed he had access to an ancient record that God needed him to translate, people began theorizing about its origins. They criticized Joseph Smith, questioned his motivations, and doubted his inspirations.

Once the Book of Mormon was published, critics finally had the text itself. Since then, it has been torn apart, analyzed, and debated for nearly 200 years. If you want to dive into these criticisms today, you face an overwhelming mountain of material to sift through. That’s where I want to narrow the focus a bit by recommending one book: Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts. (affiliate link)



I recommend it for three reasons. First, it presents excellent criticisms of the Book of Mormon. Second, the controversy surrounding its content and publication history is fascinating. Third, because of the unique character of author, B. H. Roberts.

Who Was B. H. Roberts?

Brigham Henry Roberts was a member of the Quorum of the Seventy, a church historian, and a master theologian. He independently wrote a six-volume comprehensive history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (affiliate link). He defended the faith, published works on the Book of Mormon, and even served as an editor for church magazines.

Within leadership, Roberts was highly respected. He developed curriculum for quorum meetings of the Seventy, ensuring members of the quorum had a strong grasp of the faith's theology. He was such a strong writer that his books are still on shelves today, despite his death in 1933.

What makes Studies of the Book of Mormon unique is that it wasn’t published in his lifetime. Decades after his death, his family approached the University of Utah with manuscripts and correspondence he had left behind. These documents included his detailed studies of the Book of Mormon, as well as letters exchanged with other church leaders. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the university finally published them, complete with introductions by professors B. H. Madsen and Sterling McMurrin.

Both introductions emphasize that Roberts never wavered in his faith. McMurrin even described him as the church’s “chief defender of the faith.” Yet despite Roberts’s loyalty, his manuscripts reveal how seriously he wrestled with difficult questions about the Book of Mormon.

The Five Questions

The manuscripts trace back to a man named Mr. Couch, who raised five questions about the authenticity of the Book of Mormon:

    1. How could the great diversity in primitive Indian languages have occurred in such a short period after about A.D. 400, when the Nephites, whose Hebrew language was so highly developed, disappeared?

    2. The Book of Mormon reports that the followers of Lehi, upon their arrival in the New World, found horses, which were not in existence when the first Spanish explorers arrived.

    3. Although the Jews had no knowledge of steel in 600 B.C., Nephi was reported to have had a bow of steel after he left Jerusalem.

    4. The Book of Mormon speaks of “swords and scimiters,” and yet the word “scimieter” does not appear in early literature before the rise of Mohammedanism, which took place after Lehi departed from Jerusalem.

    5. Even though silk was not known in America, the Nephites knew of and used silk.

Roberts produced a 141-page study responding to these questions. His conclusion was sobering: the church had no adequate answers. He sent his findings not only to William Riter (the man in contact with Couch) but also to the First Presidency, the Quorum of the Twelve, and the Quorum of the Seventy.

Roberts insisted that church leaders needed to be familiar with these issues, since they would affect the faith of future generations. But his warnings fell flat. During multi-day meetings where he presented his research, many leaders grew disinterested, went off on tangents, or dismissed his concerns.

Roberts was frustrated. In a letter to President Heber J. Grant, he admitted he was “painfully conscious” that the church was ill-prepared to face critics. Leadership, meanwhile, preferred to ignore the issues. To them, the Book of Mormon simply stood on its own.

Roberts Goes Further

Unsatisfied, Roberts began a second study. This time he explored what sources might have influenced Joseph Smith if the Book of Mormon was not ancient. He examined cultural ideas, sermons, and popular writings of the time—especially theories that Native Americans were descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

He noted Joseph Smith’s talent as a storyteller, his ability to absorb information, and the possibility that he could have created the book without reading much formal literature. He also examined parallels with Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews, producing a comparative study that he summarized in this collection.

Why This Book Matters

Studies of the Book of Mormon contains three parts:

  • Book of Mormon Difficulties: Roberts’s 141-page response to Couch’s five questions.

  • A Book of Mormon Study: His exploration of sources and influences available to Joseph Smith.

  • A View of the Hebrews Comparison: A summary of a larger unpublished study.

So why do I, as someone who no longer believes in the Book of Mormon, recommend this book? Because Roberts was willing to ask the hard questions.

He stood before the entire leadership of the church and said, “We don’t have answers.” He knew it would cause discomfort, but he pressed forward anyway. That example is powerful.

It shows that questioning is not the same as sinning. It’s part of the learning process. Blindly ignoring doubts brings no growth. But asking questions—no matter how hard they are—opens the door to deeper understanding.

If you stay in the church after asking those questions, more power to you. If you leave, more power to you. All that matters is that you are well informed.

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand the history, concerns, and significance of B. H. Roberts’s work.

1. Why does the article recommend *Studies of the Book of Mormon*?




2. Who was B. H. Roberts?




3. What was unusual about the publication history of Roberts’s studies?




4. What did Roberts conclude after responding to Mr. Couch’s five questions?




5. How did many church leaders react when Roberts presented his findings?




6. What did Roberts explore in his second study?




7. Why is Roberts’s work seen as important today?




8. What does the article say is most important when confronting difficult questions about the Church?




Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

By Mason
With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...
2 comments
Read

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

By Mason
Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 5: The March of Mormonism

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found  here - This article titled “The March of Mormonism” was published on July 1, 1831, in the Lockport Balance , a western New York newspaper printed by J. Mills. It appeared at a transitional moment in early Mormon history, just as Joseph Smith and a core group of followers were relocating from New York to northeastern Ohio.  Less than a year after the publication of the Book of Mormon in March 1830, the movement had shifted from a small regional body in the Palmyra–Manchester area to a community organizing migration around new revelations. The immediate scriptural backdrop to this relocation appears in Doctrine and Covenants 37 (December 1830...
Post a Comment
Read

The Peacemaker Summit and an Attempt to Silence Mormonism's Critics

By Mason
 An upcoming event called the Peacemaker Summit , organized by The Holy Rebellion , is being promoted as a gathering for faithful LDS creators. The organizing vision for this event is explicitly about displacing critics of the faith by flooding social media platforms with coordinated, high-volume pro-Mormon content. That goal deserves scrutiny. My initial reaction to the original video The Stated Aim: Outnumber the Critics Travis Lish and Christian Williams from The Holy Rebellion have been clear about their motivation. They believe critics of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints dominate online spaces and that faithful voices need to overwhelm that presence. The solution being proposed is to create enough volume to hide criticisms from search results.  ... our goal is 1 billion views per month  collectively  as Latter Day Saint creators. Imagine a world where when you search Mormon or LDS or Joseph Smith  across any platform, what you would see...
1 comment
Read

The LDS Church Flip-Flopped on the KJV

By
Recently , the LDS church announced updated guidance on the "approved" list of Bible translation for use in local congregations, spanning both English and international language versions. You can find the specifics of this guidance in the LDS General Handbook . The Updated Narrative On January 6, 2026, an interview was hosted by BYU to highlight the updated LDS Bible recommendations: Josh Sears, Associate Professor of Ancient Scripture [L]anguage just keeps evolving. That's a natural thing. And that's nothing to be afraid of. That's just how language works. And we see out throughout history that as language gets of the scriptures gets too far removed from what people are speaking, there's always a need to update and modernize ... So, when the announcement came about the handbook updates that were going to be more flexible and allow for a variety of translations to work alongside the King James, it didn't really surprise me because to me this was aligned ...
Post a Comment
Read

How Does the Mormon Church Keep Finding Me?

By Mason
The “Locating Members” page on the church’s Tech Wiki, now removed from the public site, explains that when a member moves without providing a new address, local leaders are expected to try to find out where that person went. The responsibility usually falls to the ward clerk, working under the direction of the bishop. The record isn’t automatically dropped just because attendance stops.  The full set of instructions is found below, but first, here are some points you need to consider about the religion systematically tracking down "lost" members. Form provided by the wiki First, the system does not recognize disengagement as a valid outcome. The wiki makes clear that when someone stops attending or moves without updating records, the organization treats this as missing data, not a personal decision. Silence is interpreted as a problem to solve. That alone creates an unhealthy dynamic because it removes a person’s ability to quietly exit. Second, the responsibility is instit...
1 comment
Read

I Watched the Peacemaker Summit So You Don't Have To

By
If you're like most people, you didn't even know this was happening; and, like a good sneeze, it was gone by the time you realized it. (Be warned: there's a lot of YouTube and Instagram posts linked in this article.) Who is The Holy Rebellion? If you're not familiar with The Holy Rebellion , they're a pair of LDS business investors and influencers from Utah - Travis Lish and Christian Williams . In an interview with Greg Matsen of The Cwic Show online podcast, the boys at The Holy Rebellion describe how the y came up with their Instagram handle (and I'll highlight some interesting statements): So we, starting at from that point - this was probably four, five, six years ago even - but we just kind of started meeting...and over time, it became clear that the only thing - our biggest mutual interest was the gospel of Jesus Christ ...and we were talking about Paul and how Paul was just unashamed...and we concluded that if we want to be like Paul, we have to find th...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read
e
Link copied!