Skip to main content

Every Mormon Should Read Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts.

Image
By Mason

 



I would probably say that the Book of Mormon is one of the most heavily criticized pieces of literature ever put into circulation. These criticisms go back even before it was published. From the moment Joseph Smith claimed he had access to an ancient record that God needed him to translate, people began theorizing about its origins. They criticized Joseph Smith, questioned his motivations, and doubted his inspirations.

Once the Book of Mormon was published, critics finally had the text itself. Since then, it has been torn apart, analyzed, and debated for nearly 200 years. If you want to dive into these criticisms today, you face an overwhelming mountain of material to sift through. That’s where I want to narrow the focus a bit by recommending one book: Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts. (affiliate link)



I recommend it for three reasons. First, it presents excellent criticisms of the Book of Mormon. Second, the controversy surrounding its content and publication history is fascinating. Third, because of the unique character of author, B. H. Roberts.

Who Was B. H. Roberts?

Brigham Henry Roberts was a member of the Quorum of the Seventy, a church historian, and a master theologian. He independently wrote a six-volume comprehensive history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (affiliate link). He defended the faith, published works on the Book of Mormon, and even served as an editor for church magazines.

Within leadership, Roberts was highly respected. He developed curriculum for quorum meetings of the Seventy, ensuring members of the quorum had a strong grasp of the faith's theology. He was such a strong writer that his books are still on shelves today, despite his death in 1933.

What makes Studies of the Book of Mormon unique is that it wasn’t published in his lifetime. Decades after his death, his family approached the University of Utah with manuscripts and correspondence he had left behind. These documents included his detailed studies of the Book of Mormon, as well as letters exchanged with other church leaders. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the university finally published them, complete with introductions by professors B. H. Madsen and Sterling McMurrin.

Both introductions emphasize that Roberts never wavered in his faith. McMurrin even described him as the church’s “chief defender of the faith.” Yet despite Roberts’s loyalty, his manuscripts reveal how seriously he wrestled with difficult questions about the Book of Mormon.

The Five Questions

The manuscripts trace back to a man named Mr. Couch, who raised five questions about the authenticity of the Book of Mormon:

    1. How could the great diversity in primitive Indian languages have occurred in such a short period after about A.D. 400, when the Nephites, whose Hebrew language was so highly developed, disappeared?

    2. The Book of Mormon reports that the followers of Lehi, upon their arrival in the New World, found horses, which were not in existence when the first Spanish explorers arrived.

    3. Although the Jews had no knowledge of steel in 600 B.C., Nephi was reported to have had a bow of steel after he left Jerusalem.

    4. The Book of Mormon speaks of “swords and scimiters,” and yet the word “scimieter” does not appear in early literature before the rise of Mohammedanism, which took place after Lehi departed from Jerusalem.

    5. Even though silk was not known in America, the Nephites knew of and used silk.

Roberts produced a 141-page study responding to these questions. His conclusion was sobering: the church had no adequate answers. He sent his findings not only to William Riter (the man in contact with Couch) but also to the First Presidency, the Quorum of the Twelve, and the Quorum of the Seventy.

Roberts insisted that church leaders needed to be familiar with these issues, since they would affect the faith of future generations. But his warnings fell flat. During multi-day meetings where he presented his research, many leaders grew disinterested, went off on tangents, or dismissed his concerns.

Roberts was frustrated. In a letter to President Heber J. Grant, he admitted he was “painfully conscious” that the church was ill-prepared to face critics. Leadership, meanwhile, preferred to ignore the issues. To them, the Book of Mormon simply stood on its own.

Roberts Goes Further

Unsatisfied, Roberts began a second study. This time he explored what sources might have influenced Joseph Smith if the Book of Mormon was not ancient. He examined cultural ideas, sermons, and popular writings of the time—especially theories that Native Americans were descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

He noted Joseph Smith’s talent as a storyteller, his ability to absorb information, and the possibility that he could have created the book without reading much formal literature. He also examined parallels with Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews, producing a comparative study that he summarized in this collection.

Why This Book Matters

Studies of the Book of Mormon contains three parts:

  • Book of Mormon Difficulties: Roberts’s 141-page response to Couch’s five questions.

  • A Book of Mormon Study: His exploration of sources and influences available to Joseph Smith.

  • A View of the Hebrews Comparison: A summary of a larger unpublished study.

So why do I, as someone who no longer believes in the Book of Mormon, recommend this book? Because Roberts was willing to ask the hard questions.

He stood before the entire leadership of the church and said, “We don’t have answers.” He knew it would cause discomfort, but he pressed forward anyway. That example is powerful.

It shows that questioning is not the same as sinning. It’s part of the learning process. Blindly ignoring doubts brings no growth. But asking questions—no matter how hard they are—opens the door to deeper understanding.

If you stay in the church after asking those questions, more power to you. If you leave, more power to you. All that matters is that you are well informed.

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand the history, concerns, and significance of B. H. Roberts’s work.

1. Why does the article recommend *Studies of the Book of Mormon*?




2. Who was B. H. Roberts?




3. What was unusual about the publication history of Roberts’s studies?




4. What did Roberts conclude after responding to Mr. Couch’s five questions?




5. How did many church leaders react when Roberts presented his findings?




6. What did Roberts explore in his second study?




7. Why is Roberts’s work seen as important today?




8. What does the article say is most important when confronting difficult questions about the Church?




Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Post a Comment
Read

Are You Temple Worthy?

By Mason
Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple
6 comments
Read

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read

What is the CES letter?

By Mason
In 2012, Jeremy Runnells was struggling with questions about LDS history that he couldn’t reconcile with what he had learned growing up. He had served a mission, gone to BYU, and lived his life inside of Mormonism, but the sources he was reading didn’t line up with the version he’d been taught. When he spoke with a Church Educational System director about it, he was asked to write his concerns in one place so they could review them together. He sat down and did exactly that. He pulled notes, checked references, and laid out the issues in a document that ended up more than eighty pages long. He sent it back expecting a follow-up. The follow-up never came. That unanswered list of questions eventually became known online as the CES Letter. In April 2013, he shared his document to reddit on r/exmormon under the title “Letter to a CES Director.” The file spread fast because it pulled together problems that members usually encounter one at a time. Runnells later said he wrote it to underst...
1 comment
Read

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

By Mason
   In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “ 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet. ” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God. 1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything  This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader. 2. The living prophet is more important than script...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 4: Who I Am

By
I felt closer to God when I finally stopped believing in Him.  Let me explain. When I was a kid, I’d sit in church and listen to people talk about God as if he was real . I say “he” because God was also defined as a male, and that definition supposedly came from thousands of years of tradition. God was like me : he had feelings or grief and joy; he wanted me to be happy; he had ambition and plans for me, just like I did for myself. What a wonderful thought that a Supreme Being had me in mind! But God was also “He.” I say that because the title implied a king, nobility, and sovereignty. God was not like me : He was omnipotent; He knew better than me; He was always in control; He wasn’t flawed like me; He didn’t make mistakes; He knew the end from the beginning. I couldn’t ultimately know God, but He wanted me to draw close to Him.   According to the traditions I grew up in, the way we approached God was through “righteousness,” aka, doing good things and avoiding bad things....
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read

Influencers for Zion

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced fourteen new members of the Young Men General Advisory Council , a group that aids the Young Men General Presidency in council and leadership of boys ages twelve to eighteen. The announcement has cause quite an online stir in Mormon spaces as several of these men already have established online followings. Religious youth retention is slipping and institutional messaging struggles to compete with platforms where teens spend most of their time.  Youth these days have a tendency to put a lot of trust in creators, sometimes even more than official statements. By calling men with YouTube channels, filmmaking schools, and large digital classrooms, the Church gains access to people who already know how to package a message and keep an audience engaged. These are essential skillsets for any organization to have in our online world. Who the New Council Members Are Derral E. Eves helped build The Chosen and spent years sha...
Post a Comment
Read
Link copied!