Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Every Mormon Should Read Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts.

Image
By Mason

 



I would probably say that the Book of Mormon is one of the most heavily criticized pieces of literature ever put into circulation. These criticisms go back even before it was published. From the moment Joseph Smith claimed he had access to an ancient record that God needed him to translate, people began theorizing about its origins. They criticized Joseph Smith, questioned his motivations, and doubted his inspirations.

Once the Book of Mormon was published, critics finally had the text itself. Since then, it has been torn apart, analyzed, and debated for nearly 200 years. If you want to dive into these criticisms today, you face an overwhelming mountain of material to sift through. That’s where I want to narrow the focus a bit by recommending one book: Studies of the Book of Mormon by B. H. Roberts. (affiliate link)



I recommend it for three reasons. First, it presents excellent criticisms of the Book of Mormon. Second, the controversy surrounding its content and publication history is fascinating. Third, because of the unique character of author, B. H. Roberts.

Who Was B. H. Roberts?

Brigham Henry Roberts was a member of the Quorum of the Seventy, a church historian, and a master theologian. He independently wrote a six-volume comprehensive history of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (affiliate link). He defended the faith, published works on the Book of Mormon, and even served as an editor for church magazines.

Within leadership, Roberts was highly respected. He developed curriculum for quorum meetings of the Seventy, ensuring members of the quorum had a strong grasp of the faith's theology. He was such a strong writer that his books are still on shelves today, despite his death in 1933.

What makes Studies of the Book of Mormon unique is that it wasn’t published in his lifetime. Decades after his death, his family approached the University of Utah with manuscripts and correspondence he had left behind. These documents included his detailed studies of the Book of Mormon, as well as letters exchanged with other church leaders. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the university finally published them, complete with introductions by professors B. H. Madsen and Sterling McMurrin.

Both introductions emphasize that Roberts never wavered in his faith. McMurrin even described him as the church’s “chief defender of the faith.” Yet despite Roberts’s loyalty, his manuscripts reveal how seriously he wrestled with difficult questions about the Book of Mormon.

The Five Questions

The manuscripts trace back to a man named Mr. Couch, who raised five questions about the authenticity of the Book of Mormon:

    1. How could the great diversity in primitive Indian languages have occurred in such a short period after about A.D. 400, when the Nephites, whose Hebrew language was so highly developed, disappeared?

    2. The Book of Mormon reports that the followers of Lehi, upon their arrival in the New World, found horses, which were not in existence when the first Spanish explorers arrived.

    3. Although the Jews had no knowledge of steel in 600 B.C., Nephi was reported to have had a bow of steel after he left Jerusalem.

    4. The Book of Mormon speaks of “swords and scimiters,” and yet the word “scimieter” does not appear in early literature before the rise of Mohammedanism, which took place after Lehi departed from Jerusalem.

    5. Even though silk was not known in America, the Nephites knew of and used silk.

Roberts produced a 141-page study responding to these questions. His conclusion was sobering: the church had no adequate answers. He sent his findings not only to William Riter (the man in contact with Couch) but also to the First Presidency, the Quorum of the Twelve, and the Quorum of the Seventy.

Roberts insisted that church leaders needed to be familiar with these issues, since they would affect the faith of future generations. But his warnings fell flat. During multi-day meetings where he presented his research, many leaders grew disinterested, went off on tangents, or dismissed his concerns.

Roberts was frustrated. In a letter to President Heber J. Grant, he admitted he was “painfully conscious” that the church was ill-prepared to face critics. Leadership, meanwhile, preferred to ignore the issues. To them, the Book of Mormon simply stood on its own.

Roberts Goes Further

Unsatisfied, Roberts began a second study. This time he explored what sources might have influenced Joseph Smith if the Book of Mormon was not ancient. He examined cultural ideas, sermons, and popular writings of the time—especially theories that Native Americans were descendants of the lost tribes of Israel.

He noted Joseph Smith’s talent as a storyteller, his ability to absorb information, and the possibility that he could have created the book without reading much formal literature. He also examined parallels with Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews, producing a comparative study that he summarized in this collection.

Why This Book Matters

Studies of the Book of Mormon contains three parts:

  • Book of Mormon Difficulties: Roberts’s 141-page response to Couch’s five questions.

  • A Book of Mormon Study: His exploration of sources and influences available to Joseph Smith.

  • A View of the Hebrews Comparison: A summary of a larger unpublished study.

So why do I, as someone who no longer believes in the Book of Mormon, recommend this book? Because Roberts was willing to ask the hard questions.

He stood before the entire leadership of the church and said, “We don’t have answers.” He knew it would cause discomfort, but he pressed forward anyway. That example is powerful.

It shows that questioning is not the same as sinning. It’s part of the learning process. Blindly ignoring doubts brings no growth. But asking questions—no matter how hard they are—opens the door to deeper understanding.

If you stay in the church after asking those questions, more power to you. If you leave, more power to you. All that matters is that you are well informed.

Check Your Understanding:

Test how well you understand the history, concerns, and significance of B. H. Roberts’s work.

1. Why does the article recommend *Studies of the Book of Mormon*?




2. Who was B. H. Roberts?




3. What was unusual about the publication history of Roberts’s studies?




4. What did Roberts conclude after responding to Mr. Couch’s five questions?




5. How did many church leaders react when Roberts presented his findings?




6. What did Roberts explore in his second study?




7. Why is Roberts’s work seen as important today?




8. What does the article say is most important when confronting difficult questions about the Church?




Category:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Peacemaker Summit and an Attempt to Silence Mormonism's Critics

By Mason
 An upcoming event called the Peacemaker Summit , organized by The Holy Rebellion , is being promoted as a gathering for faithful LDS creators. The organizing vision for this event is explicitly about displacing critics of the faith by flooding social media platforms with coordinated, high-volume pro-Mormon content. That goal deserves scrutiny. My initial reaction to the original video The Stated Aim: Outnumber the Critics Travis Lish and Christian Williams from The Holy Rebellion have been clear about their motivation. They believe critics of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints dominate online spaces and that faithful voices need to overwhelm that presence. The solution being proposed is to create enough volume to hide criticisms from search results.  ... our goal is 1 billion views per month  collectively  as Latter Day Saint creators. Imagine a world where when you search Mormon or LDS or Joseph Smith  across any platform, what you would see...
1 comment
Read

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

By Mason
Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...
Post a Comment
Read

LDS Apologists Try to Beat a Dead Horse

By
It looks like the topic of horses and the Book of Mormon is going to crop up every few months like a nasty case of eczema, so I feel it’s worthwhile to summarize the debate as it currently stands. There's another post on this blog  about more recent research, but it always goes back to the (in)famous analysis done by Matthew Roper and his colleagues at BYU, John Clark and Wade Ardern, all the way back to 2005. But first, let's look even further back.  What the Book of Mormon Said The word “horse” appears 14 total times in the Book of Mormon in the context of domesticated livestock, with half of those references being connected with pulling chariots of war. Both Lamanite and Nephite peoples equated these horses with those described in Isaiah 2:7 and 5:28, which Nephi expressly quotes in his own record (compare 2 Nephi 12:7 and 15:28), with no distinction made between them. The horses of the Americas, per the Book of Mormon, are intended to be the same in form and function to ...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 4: Fanaticism

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found  here - The article titled “Fanaticism” was published on February 11, 1831, in the United States Gazette , a Philadelphia paper with national circulation. It reprints material from the Painesville Gazette , reflecting local reports from northeastern Ohio rather than direct investigation by the Gazette itself. The author is unnamed, consistent with early-19th-century newspaper practice, and the tone reflects mainstream Protestant skepticism toward emerging religious movements. The piece focuses on Kirtland and nearby areas in Geauga and Cuyahoga counties at a very early stage in Mormon development, less than a year after the Book of Mormon’s publica...
Post a Comment
Read

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

By Mason
  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...
Post a Comment
Read

Encouraging Marriage: Lowering the Age for Female Missionaries

By Mason
 In October 2012, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints officially lowered the minimum age for missionary service. Before that change, men could begin at age 19 and women at age 21. The update allowed men to start at 18 and women at 19, a major shift in how young Latter-day Saints approached their early adult years. That change dramatically increased missionary numbers, with applications skyrocketing in the weeks after the announcement and women making up a much larger share of those who served.   For more than a decade after that update, the rule stayed the same. Women could serve at 19 and men at 18, with women serving 18-month missions and men serving two years. In November 2025 the Church again changed the rule: the minimum age for women to serve was lowered to 18, equalizing it with men.  What made this new policy notable wasn’t just equality in age; it was the statements that came with it.   In a January 2026 interview with the Church’s own Deseret News, Presid...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

By Mason
     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read
e
Link copied!