Skip to main content

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word. 

The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were shared on reddit.



But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window. 




When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “Keeping your registration alive.”


Here is the tension. For years the Church has tried to distance itself from the word. Leaders asked members to stop using Mormon as a label. The Church rebranded its websites. It retired the phrase Mormon Messages. It scrubbed the word from manuals. The public campaign insisted that Mormon was inaccurate, misleading, and spiritually harmful. 


In daily speech, materials, and media, the Church’s official line is that it does not want to be known as Mormon. But in the legal arena, the institution now argues that use of the word by others violates its trademark rights.


The problem is that trademark law rewards consistent use. The USPTO requires renewal evidence in specific windows. Owners must file a Section 8 declaration between years 9 and 10 and again every 10 years after that. That filing must include a specimen, which is a real example of the mark as it appears on goods or services today. If they cannot show use at all, the registration is cancelled



Source: USPTO “Keeping your registration alive.”


This puts the Mormon Stories situation in an position. The Church claims strong and enforceable rights over a term it publicly rejects. Yet the moment they accuse someone else of using the word, they highlight the very question they will have to answer starting in 2026. 


Update (12/09/25)

Wouldn't publishing The Book of  Mormon fulfill this requirement of continued use?

The USPTO allows the public to access the specimens that have been submitted over the years to prove use of the trademark. Those can be found here under "documents". In none of the filings has the church used The Book of Mormon. Here is what they have used instead:


The Mormon Messages For Youth page on LDS.org (No longer in use)


The Mormon Messages For Youth YouTube Channel (No longer in use)


Mormon Genealogy on family search (seems to have ben renamed ("Latter-day Saint Online Genealogy Records")



Signs at many church buildings and historic sites used to display "The Mormons" in parenthesis. But this practice is now strictly against the church style guide


Comments


  1. So this wasnt an issue for the last ~20 years that Mormon Stories has been around? Astonishing timing

    ReplyDelete
  2. They still print Mormon on the book of mormon and distribute it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I updated the end of the article to address this.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...

Code Names and Church Finances

Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Link copied!