Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Do Mormons Get Their Own Planet?

Image
By Mason


One of the most common criticisms about Mormonism is that faithful members believe they will “get their own planet” in the next life. Whenever this idea appears, the Church and its defenders move quickly to deny it. FAIR, the main apologetic group, calls the phrase a caricature: “Reducing [exaltation] to ruling a planet caricatures a profound and complex belief. Claims that Mormons hope for ‘their own planets’ almost always aim to disrespect and marginalize” (FAIR, “Gods of Their Own Planets”). 


The Church’s official Newsroom FAQ also weighs in:

 



On the surface these answers look straightforward. God does not hand out planets. Yet the very same sources go on to describe exaltation as receiving all that the Father has, which includes creative power. FAIR acknowledges that exalted beings “will share in all that the Father has including his creative powers” (FAIR) and even goes on the share a quote from church leadership which explicitly states that we can one day govern over worlds 


FAIR, “Gods of Their Own Planets”


In other words, they deny the phrasing while simultaneously affirming the concept.

Joseph Smith taught in the King Follett sermon that “the mind or the intelligence which man possesses is co-equal with God himself” (Smith 1844). God organized these intelligences into spirit children, gave them mortal bodies, and through resurrection offers perfected bodies. Those who remain faithful may achieve exaltation. 

A church manual describes exaltation this way: exalted beings “will become gods. They will have their families forever and will have all power, glory, dominion, and knowledge” (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 1976, 29). 

If exalted beings are to become like God, then scripture’s description of God’s work reveals what they will do. In the Pearl of Great Price God declares: “And worlds without number have I created” (Moses 1:33). Doctrine and Covenants 76:24 teaches that “the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God.” Creation of inhabited worlds is presented as central to God’s nature. By the logic of eternal progression, it becomes the destiny of those who are exalted.


Church leaders have been explicit about this point. Lorenzo Snow summarized the doctrine in his well-known couplet: “As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be.” Bruce R. McConkie wrote: “For them new earths are created, and thus the on-rolling purposes of the Gods of Heaven go forward from eternity to eternity” (Mormon Doctrine, 1966, 257). The 2001 Gospel Fundamentals manual is even more direct: exalted beings “will be able to have spirit children and make new worlds for them to live on, and do all the things our Father in Heaven has done” (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2001, 201).

The issue is not whether the doctrine exists. It clearly does. The issue is in the language. Saying “get your own planet” makes the teaching sound cartoonish, which is the issue FAIR seems to have. Saying “create worlds without number” makes it sound scriptural and noble. Yet both describe the same belief: exalted beings continue God’s work by creating new worlds and populating them with His children.

The official Newsroom answer tries to sidestep this tension by insisting the “planet” idea is not in scripture. That is technically true, but it ignores the scriptures and teachings that describe exalted humans inheriting God’s creative role. FAIR follows the same pattern: deny the caricature, then affirm the concept under different wording.

So... do Mormons get their own planet? According to the Church’s public-facing language, no. According to scripture, prophetic teaching, and instructional manuals, yes, exalted beings create worlds, populate them, and preside as gods. The difference is only in phrasing. In reality Latter-day Saints are not promised one planet. They are promised the capacity to create “worlds without number.”

__________

References

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 1976. Principles of the Gospel. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. http://www.thearmouryministries.org/pdfdoc/gospelprinciples.pdf

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2001. Gospel Fundamentals. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Church Newsroom. “Frequently Asked Questions About Latter-day Saints.”  https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/frequently-asked-questions

FAIR. “Mormonism and the Nature of God/Deification of Man/Gods of Their Own Planets.” FAIR Latter-day Saints.  https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/Mormonism_and_the_nature_of_God/Deification_of_man/Gods_of_their_own_planets

McConkie, Bruce R. 1966. Mormon Doctrine. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft. https://amzn.to/3HFYsdn (affiliate link)

Smith, Joseph. 1844. The King Follett Sermon. https://josephsmithfoundation.org/docs/the-king-follett-sermon/

Moses 1:33, 35. Pearl of Great Price. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Doctrine and Covenants 76:24. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Check Your Understanding: “Do Mormons Get Their Own Planet?”

Test how well you understand the gap between LDS public messaging and internal teachings on exaltation.

1. What common criticism of Mormonism does this article address?




2. How does FAIR initially respond to the “own planet” idea?




3. What key point does FAIR still affirm about exalted beings?




4. According to Joseph Smith’s King Follett sermon, what is said about human intelligence?




5. How does the 1976 Principles of the Gospel manual describe exalted beings?




6. What do Moses 1:33 and Doctrine and Covenants 76:24 say about God’s work?




7. What does the 2001 Gospel Fundamentals manual explicitly teach about exalted beings?




8. What is the article’s main conclusion about the “own planet” question?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

By Mason
 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...
3 comments
Read

Where Did Joseph Smith Dig for Treasure?

By Mason
Before Joseph Smith was known as a prophet, he was known locally for treasure digging. An article written by Dan Vogel   mapped out the physical locations connected to that earlier phase of Smith’s life. Drawing from court records, affidavits, neighbor testimony, and later reminiscences, Vogel was able to place Smith on specific hillsides, farms, and riverbanks across western New York and northern Pennsylvania. Show Dan Vogel's Full Article (If you have issues on mobile, you can read the full document  here ) The article itself is a valuable asset to anybody who wants to understand the treasure digging activities of Joseph Smith. However, due to the design of the maps provided it may be difficult to immediate tell where the digs took place. Which in my opinion, may limit the sharing of his research. As such, I took it upon myself to update the map in Google Earth using Dan Vogel's research as my guide. This gives us a bit of clearer idea of w...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

By Mason
 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...
1 comment
Read

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...
Post a Comment
Read

How Does the Mormon Church Keep Finding Me?

By Mason
The “Locating Members” page on the church’s Tech Wiki, now removed from the public site, explains that when a member moves without providing a new address, local leaders are expected to try to find out where that person went. The responsibility usually falls to the ward clerk, working under the direction of the bishop. The record isn’t automatically dropped just because attendance stops.  The full set of instructions is found below, but first, here are some points you need to consider about the religion systematically tracking down "lost" members. Form provided by the wiki First, the system does not recognize disengagement as a valid outcome. The wiki makes clear that when someone stops attending or moves without updating records, the organization treats this as missing data, not a personal decision. Silence is interpreted as a problem to solve. That alone creates an unhealthy dynamic because it removes a person’s ability to quietly exit. Second, the responsibility is instit...
1 comment
Read

Influencers for Zion

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced fourteen new members of the Young Men General Advisory Council , a group that aids the Young Men General Presidency in council and leadership of boys ages twelve to eighteen. The announcement has cause quite an online stir in Mormon spaces as several of these men already have established online followings. Religious youth retention is slipping and institutional messaging struggles to compete with platforms where teens spend most of their time.  Youth these days have a tendency to put a lot of trust in creators, sometimes even more than official statements. By calling men with YouTube channels, filmmaking schools, and large digital classrooms, the Church gains access to people who already know how to package a message and keep an audience engaged. These are essential skillsets for any organization to have in our online world. Who the New Council Members Are Derral E. Eves helped build The Chosen and spent years sha...
Post a Comment
Read

Full Text - Mormons Taking Oaths of the Temple House (1904)

By Mason
  This article appeared in 1904, during the height of national scrutiny surrounding the LDS Church and the U.S. Senate investigation into whether Apostle Reed Smoot should be seated as a senator. At the center of that inquiry were questions the public had debated for decades but rarely heard addressed in sworn testimony.  What actually happened inside the Endowment House ?  What oaths were required?  Do the oaths conflict with civic loyalty, democratic norms, and basic transparency? The reporting below relies on testimony given under oath to the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections and presents the claims exactly as they were reported to a national audience. This was not written as theology or internal instruction. It was written as political journalism, aimed at informing a non-Mormon public that largely had no access to temple ceremonies and relied on secondhand descriptions. THE WASHINGTON TIMES DECEMBER 14, 1904 MORMONS TAKING OATHS OF ENDOWMENT HOUS...
Post a Comment
Read

Mormon Church Loosens Grip on the KJV Bible

By Mason
 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has clarified its position on Bible translations. In its official statement, “ Holy Bible Translations and Editions Used by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ,” the Church explains that it values multiple Bible translations because they help people understand scripture “in the language they know best” .  The statement affirms that the King James Version (KJV) remains the preferred English Bible for Church use, while also acknowledging that some readers benefit from more modern language. That group includes youth, new converts, and people learning English. The recommended English Bible translations are as follows: Source: churchofjesuschrist.org Concerns about KJV comprehension have existed for decades. Yet only now does the handbook clearly frame Bible use around reading level and understanding. The update formalizes what many families were already doing.  The challenge is easy to identify. The KJV was trans...
Post a Comment
Read

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

By Mason
This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...
Post a Comment
Read

There Is No Curse, Part 5: Then What Is It?

By
We need to talk about the current apologetics attempting to downplay the Lamanite curse. Nephi Sees Our Day In preparation for my next topic, I was reading 1 Nephi 13:15 , where Nephi sees a vision of the future for his own civilization and the European conquest of America. This passage stuck out to me: And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. This is in direct contrast to 1 Nephi 12:23 : And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. You might notice that there is ample ambiguity in both passages, but in juxtaposing these two peoples, we see a contrast that I just can’t reconcile if the curse is only “symbolic” or “spiritual.” In comparing Gentiles to Lam...
Post a Comment
Read
Link copied!