Skip to main content

Do Mormons Get Their Own Planet?



One of the most common criticisms about Mormonism is that faithful members believe they will “get their own planet” in the next life. Whenever this idea appears, the Church and its defenders move quickly to deny it. FAIR, the main apologetic group, calls the phrase a caricature: “Reducing [exaltation] to ruling a planet caricatures a profound and complex belief. Claims that Mormons hope for ‘their own planets’ almost always aim to disrespect and marginalize” (FAIR, “Gods of Their Own Planets”). 


The Church’s official Newsroom FAQ also weighs in:

 



On the surface these answers look straightforward. God does not hand out planets. Yet the very same sources go on to describe exaltation as receiving all that the Father has, which includes creative power. FAIR acknowledges that exalted beings “will share in all that the Father has including his creative powers” (FAIR) and even goes on the share a quote from church leadership which explicitly states that we can one day govern over worlds 


FAIR, “Gods of Their Own Planets”


In other words, they deny the phrasing while simultaneously affirming the concept.

Joseph Smith taught in the King Follett sermon that “the mind or the intelligence which man possesses is co-equal with God himself” (Smith 1844). God organized these intelligences into spirit children, gave them mortal bodies, and through resurrection offers perfected bodies. Those who remain faithful may achieve exaltation. 

A church manual describes exaltation this way: exalted beings “will become gods. They will have their families forever and will have all power, glory, dominion, and knowledge” (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 1976, 29). 

If exalted beings are to become like God, then scripture’s description of God’s work reveals what they will do. In the Pearl of Great Price God declares: “And worlds without number have I created” (Moses 1:33). Doctrine and Covenants 76:24 teaches that “the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God.” Creation of inhabited worlds is presented as central to God’s nature. By the logic of eternal progression, it becomes the destiny of those who are exalted.


Church leaders have been explicit about this point. Lorenzo Snow summarized the doctrine in his well-known couplet: “As man now is, God once was; as God now is, man may be.” Bruce R. McConkie wrote: “For them new earths are created, and thus the on-rolling purposes of the Gods of Heaven go forward from eternity to eternity” (Mormon Doctrine, 1966, 257). The 2001 Gospel Fundamentals manual is even more direct: exalted beings “will be able to have spirit children and make new worlds for them to live on, and do all the things our Father in Heaven has done” (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2001, 201).

The issue is not whether the doctrine exists. It clearly does. The issue is in the language. Saying “get your own planet” makes the teaching sound cartoonish, which is the issue FAIR seems to have. Saying “create worlds without number” makes it sound scriptural and noble. Yet both describe the same belief: exalted beings continue God’s work by creating new worlds and populating them with His children.

The official Newsroom answer tries to sidestep this tension by insisting the “planet” idea is not in scripture. That is technically true, but it ignores the scriptures and teachings that describe exalted humans inheriting God’s creative role. FAIR follows the same pattern: deny the caricature, then affirm the concept under different wording.

So... do Mormons get their own planet? According to the Church’s public-facing language, no. According to scripture, prophetic teaching, and instructional manuals, yes, exalted beings create worlds, populate them, and preside as gods. The difference is only in phrasing. In reality Latter-day Saints are not promised one planet. They are promised the capacity to create “worlds without number.”

__________

References

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 1976. Principles of the Gospel. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. http://www.thearmouryministries.org/pdfdoc/gospelprinciples.pdf

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2001. Gospel Fundamentals. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Church Newsroom. “Frequently Asked Questions About Latter-day Saints.”  https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/frequently-asked-questions

FAIR. “Mormonism and the Nature of God/Deification of Man/Gods of Their Own Planets.” FAIR Latter-day Saints.  https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/Mormonism_and_the_nature_of_God/Deification_of_man/Gods_of_their_own_planets

McConkie, Bruce R. 1966. Mormon Doctrine. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft. https://amzn.to/3HFYsdn (affiliate link)

Smith, Joseph. 1844. The King Follett Sermon. https://josephsmithfoundation.org/docs/the-king-follett-sermon/

Moses 1:33, 35. Pearl of Great Price. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Doctrine and Covenants 76:24. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicy available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Mormo...

Is Mormonism a Cult?

     The word “cult” usually brings to mind the most destructive examples of control, where people lose their freedom, identity, or even their lives. That harm is real and should never be minimized. But the psychology behind those groups does not appear only in the extremes.       The same methods of influence exist in more common institutions too, but often differ in intensity. Religion, politics, and corporate systems all use similar tools to shape belief and loyalty. Mormonism belongs on that spectrum, not because it is as harmful as the worst examples, but because it relies on many of the same patterns of authority and conformity.      One way to see this clearly is through the BITE Model of Authoritarian Control. The model, created by Steven Hassan, outlines how groups shape members through four areas of influence: B ehavior I nformation T hought E motion.       Each form of control helps a system maintain stabil...

Are Mormons Christian?

People keep asking whether Mormons are Christian, as if that’s the issue that matters. It’s not. Mormons love this question since its probably one of the tamest aspects of the faith to question. The other day I was reading some comments on an online post that was debating the issue of whether or not Mormons were Christian, and this interaction caught my eye. One individual declared that the FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) “never were and never will be Mormon.”  Now, I can't imagine that many Mormons will share this same sentiment, considering that the FLDS church literally emerged from the exact same roots as the Utah church. But this interaction ironically demonstrates the exact same mindset that other Christians have about Mormons. Some Christians don’t consider Mormons Christian because Latter-day Saint teachings reject key doctrines established by early Christian creeds, like the Trinity, original sin, and the belief that Go...

A Covenant People - 1: Magnalia Christi Americana

There is a very distinct moral rhythm that drives the entire storyline of the Book of Mormon. This is often referred to within the church as the “pride cycle.”    It goes something like this: When the people remember God, they live peacefully and prosper. Their obedience brings material success and national stability. Then, wealth and comfort begin to shift their focus. Pride replaces gratitude. The people start to divide into social classes, persecute the poor, and boast of their own strength. As pride spreads, the society grows corrupt. Prophets warn them to repent, but their voices are ignored or mocked. Eventually, destruction comes through war, famine, or internal collapse. Suffering drives the people to humility. They remember God again, repent, and the Lord blesses them with peace and prosperity. Then the cycle restarts. This pattern is repeated continually from the beginning of the Book of Mormon and is claimed to be the direct result of covenant with God. That when m...