Skip to main content

My Temple Experience

I want to share a little bit about my experience going through a Mormon temple. Specifically, I’m going to talk about the expectations that were set up from a young age, what it was like the first few times I went, and how I eventually lost my faith in temple worship overall.

I grew up in northern Utah. My parents were LDS, so I was a child of the covenant. I was baptized at eight and raised in church culture—Boy Scouts, Young Men’s, seminary, a mission. Basically the typical path you’d expect from a Mormon boy.

The point I want to make is that the decision to attend the temple wasn’t just a spur-of-the-moment choice. You don’t just wake up one day and decide to go. At least not in my experience. I was born into the church, started attending Primary, and from that point on, I was told I’d get baptized, receive the Aaronic priesthood, receive the Melchizedek priesthood, and go through the temple. That message was repeated over and over from the time I was in Sunbeams until baptism at eight. Baptism, priesthood, temple. Over and over.

When I was baptized, the next step was laid out immediately. Congratulations, now you’ll get the priesthood, then go through the temple. I was baptized in February, so there was snow everywhere. We drove up to the Logan Temple. I was wearing a winter coat—green on top, black on the bottom—holding my beanie. My mom took a picture of me in front of the temple. We printed it, put it in a frame, and next to it were the lyrics from the Primary song “I Love to See the Temple.” That picture stayed on my wall from the time I was eight until after my mission where it probably ended up in a box somewhere after I moved out.

That expectation—to go through the temple and make covenants with God—was present from the beginning. So when I got old enough to actually attend, it didn’t feel like a real decision. The only way I can explain it is that it felt as much like a choice as dropping out of high school. Some people have no problem not going. But for me, it was just the next step. Graduate high school, go through the temple, serve a mission. I knew technically it was a choice, but it never felt like one.

When I first went through, I actually enjoyed it. I didn’t really understand what was going on, which was probably why I liked it. You need to understand that in the Mormon church, worship is very Protestant. The hymns are slow and plain. There’s not a lot of physical ritual or symbolism. So when I went to the temple and suddenly I was wearing special clothes—robes, apron, hat—kneeling at an altar, performing symbolic rituals, it was new. There was a sense of mystery. There was something physical and symbolic happening that I hadn’t experienced before in my religious life. I liked it because it gave me something to think about. There was symbolism I could study. Layers to unpack. It felt like there was more to the church than I’d realized.

But that changed when I started going more often, especially during my mission. I was serving in Spokane, Washington, near the Spokane Temple, and we were encouraged to attend as often as possible. We had a set number of visits we could do. As I kept going, the novelty wore off. It stopped feeling fresh. That was when I realized that the only reason I had liked it was because the experience was new. The ceremony itself doesn’t change, you’re not learning anything new. Sure, there’s symbolism you can think about, but for the most part, it started to feel less like a spiritual experience and more like a way to keep me devoted to the church.

There were a few things that really started to bother me. One was the part in the temple video where Lucifer turns to the camera and says that if you don’t keep your covenants, you’ll be in his power. That line started to really bother me. It felt like a threat. Do I really need a direct threat from Satan to convince me to stay faithful? It didn’t feel right. It felt manipulative. Every time I went, I dreaded that line. It didn’t fit. It didn’t seem necessary. The only reason I could think of for including it was to scare people into staying obedient.

Another part that stood out was the covenant to give all of your time, talents, and abilities—not to God, but to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Some will argue that giving to the church is the same as giving to God. But if that’s the case, why not just say God? Why not make the covenant directly to him? That could be flipped just as easily. If giving to God means giving to the church, then giving to the church should mean giving to God. So why phrase it the way they do?

Those two things—the threat from Satan and the covenant to give everything to the church—are common sticking points for a lot of people. For me, they marked the shift. Temple worship started to feel less like a personal connection to God and more like a system designed to keep me in line.

That idea was reinforced by the temple recommend questions. Being temple-worthy is a constant theme in church meetings. Sacrament talks, Sunday School lessons, General Conference—they all emphasize being worthy to hold a temple recommend. But what does that really mean? Let’s look at a few of the questions.

Do you sustain the president of the Church as a prophet, seer, and revelator and the only person on earth authorized to exercise all priesthood keys? Do you sustain the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles? Do you sustain your local leaders? If you say no to any of these, you're not temple worthy. That’s not about your relationship with God. That’s about loyalty to leadership.

Do you support or promote any teachings or practices contrary to those of the Church? Are you a full tithe payer? Do you keep the covenants you made in the temple, including wearing the temple garments?

All of that reinforces the same message. Your worthiness in the eyes of God is measured by how devoted you are to the church. It’s not about how much faith you have. It’s not about your integrity or how you live your life. It’s about whether or not you follow the institution.

That just doesn’t sit right with me. Religion should be about you and God. Not you and the church.

So those are my thoughts. Maybe not as clear or polished as I’d like, but the temple experience is complicated. For some people, it’s the ritual that pushes them away. For others, it’s the symbolism that draws them in. Losing faith in the temple happens differently for everyone. For me, it wasn’t because it felt weird or cult-like. It was just the slow realization over time that there was a level of emotional manipulation I wasn’t okay with. 

Comments

  1. All of the above plus I got into the special and limited entry part of the church. Kind of like an exclusive country club. Each of us knew what the double tee shirt and underwear lines meant. We weren’t just special, we were righteous special.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

Early Mormon Criticisms - 2: The Book of Pukei

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. Part 1 can be read here In 1830 a man by the name of Abner Cole published a criticism of Joseph Smith called the Book of Pukei in the Palmyra Reflector, published under the name "Obadiah Dogberry Esquire".   Cole had access to Grandin’s print shop and saw early pages of the Book of Mormon before the public did. His reaction took the form of a mock scripture that rewrote Joseph Smith’s story into a  joke. That choice wasn’t random. He was simply recounting the events surrounding Joseph smith in a pseudobiblical style, Cole shows us that he likely recognized the Book of Mormon as part of that same genre. Events Parodied in The Book of Pukei     1. Angel Moroni – Cole rewr...

What the Maine Temple Announcement Signals

 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced on December 14, 2025 that a temple will be built in Portland, Maine . The announcement came during a regional Christmas devotional and was delivered by Elder Allen D. Haynie, a member of the Church’s Area Presidency, rather than during a General Conference session or directly by the Church president. What makes this announcement stand out is not the location, but the method. For years, temples were almost always announced during the April or October General Conference, usually by the Church president, at the close of a major session watched by a global audience. Under Russell M. Nelson, this practice became especially prominent, with long lists of new temples read out twice a year. These announcements have often been used rhetorically to imply numerical growth, even in regions with small or stagnant membership.  Announcing a temple outside of General Conference reduces the performative aspect of that claim.   T...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 3: Delusions

 This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a historical excerpt and some brief context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding.  -The full series can be found here - In 1831 Alexander Campbell published An Analysis of the Book of Mormon , one of the earliest full-length critiques of Joseph Smith’s new scripture. The piece first appeared as a review in Campbell’s periodical The Millennial Harbinger and was republished the following year, in 1832, as a standalone pamphlet for wider circulation. Campbell was a prominent religious leader and editor, and he approached the Book of Mormon as a text that needed to be tested, line by line, against the Bible it claimed to supplement. Unlike satirical responses such as Abner Cole’s Book of Pukei , Campbell did not parody Mormonism. He treated it as a serious theologica...

What is the CES letter?

In 2012, Jeremy Runnells was struggling with questions about LDS history that he couldn’t reconcile with what he had learned growing up. He had served a mission, gone to BYU, and lived his life inside of Mormonism, but the sources he was reading didn’t line up with the version he’d been taught. When he spoke with a Church Educational System director about it, he was asked to write his concerns in one place so they could review them together. He sat down and did exactly that. He pulled notes, checked references, and laid out the issues in a document that ended up more than eighty pages long. He sent it back expecting a follow-up. The follow-up never came. That unanswered list of questions eventually became known online as the CES Letter. In April 2013, he shared his document to reddit on r/exmormon under the title “Letter to a CES Director.” The file spread fast because it pulled together problems that members usually encounter one at a time. Runnells later said he wrote it to underst...

The 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet - A Response

   In 1980, Ezra Taft Benson delivered a devotional at BYU that outlined what he called the “ 14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet. ” The message spread widely within the church and shaped how Latter day Saints came to understand prophetic authority. Even if someone never read the original talk, the ideas appeared in lessons, leadership trainings, and casual conversation across generations. The fundamentals build a system that places the prophet above every competing source of guidance. When read together, they create a model of obedience and hierarchy that rests on the idea that one man speaks for God. 1. The prophet is the only person who speaks for God in everything  This first principle elevates one individual above all other voices. If only one man speaks for God, then any disagreement with him becomes a spiritual issue rather than a difference in interpretation. The structure relies on absolute trust in a single leader. 2. The living prophet is more important than script...

There Is No Curse, Part 4: Who I Am

I felt closer to God when I finally stopped believing in Him.  Let me explain. When I was a kid, I’d sit in church and listen to people talk about God as if he was real . I say “he” because God was also defined as a male, and that definition supposedly came from thousands of years of tradition. God was like me : he had feelings or grief and joy; he wanted me to be happy; he had ambition and plans for me, just like I did for myself. What a wonderful thought that a Supreme Being had me in mind! But God was also “He.” I say that because the title implied a king, nobility, and sovereignty. God was not like me : He was omnipotent; He knew better than me; He was always in control; He wasn’t flawed like me; He didn’t make mistakes; He knew the end from the beginning. I couldn’t ultimately know God, but He wanted me to draw close to Him.   According to the traditions I grew up in, the way we approached God was through “righteousness,” aka, doing good things and avoiding bad things....

Code Names and Church Finances

Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...
Link copied!