Skip to main content
Some links on this page are Amazon affiliate links. We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases.

Without the Mormon Lens: 6 - I Nephi

     As we dive into the First Book of Nephi, I wanted to address my approach to this work for the sake of full transparency.

     One of the biggest hurdles I have faced as I have prepared to share my thoughts on the Book of Mormon, is coming up with its presentation. I want to be able to help you see the narrative through a different lens, but I also want to avoid taking things out of context or unintentionally misinterpreting the text.

   To my first point, I have determined that the best course of action is to analyze the book using the original 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon. This is for two reasons.

     1. It is the original presentation of the book, there are no verses, and the chapters are the original lengths. It is the exact formatting and style that initially converted thousands of saints.

     2. I will not be referring to the Book as scripture. It is going to be presented as a historical fiction since this is the position that my study is taking. I recognize that some of my readers believe in the book as an ancient text, but that is simply not my perception. Again, I am trying to help change your perspective of the Book of Mormon and to help you understand it as a 19th century historical fiction. As such, I will not be quoting it like this,


     Instead, I will be sharing the full page that I am addressing. 

  
The Book of Mormon, 1830. Pg 5

    After each image, I will then share my thoughts, give historical background, context or opinions and when I need to quote the page, I will do so. You can just scroll past the images if you want, as I will be quoting every single line of text throughout the post. 

     I will not be retyping the book myself. I have instead opted to use the text available on Wikisource with complete trust that it is fully accurate to the original 1830 edition.

     The distinction may seem initially pointless, but I think the subtle difference is going to be very important for the intent of this project. You will be presented with each page of the Book of Mormon in a way that you likely haven't ever seen it, which may help chip away at the Mormon lens. 

   This now addresses my second challenge. Being that I do not want to discuss any of the book out of context. I will not be sharing something from Nephi and then immediately tying it into something in Alma. We will quite literally be reading the book, page by page, from beginning to end. The only time I will address another page is if we are referencing something we have already read up to that point. I will try and stick to this the absolute best that I can. With this approach, the discussion can get more complex as the book itself gains complexity.

     I may occasionally show the text side by side with other sources as needed if there is a clear plagiarism or similitude to another text. Again, I do not want to retype pages upon pages of old books. My method here is to either find a transcription online or to ask ChatGPT version 4o to copy the text for me.

    The method works pretty well and despite having to fix a few typos if the original image quality was poor, it saves me quite bit of time. I will of course always cite the books and provide a link so you can read them yourselves. I only use ChatGPT as a method of extracting text or for it's functionality as a search engine. I absolutely refuse to use it to actually write the content of this blog. All sources are personally read and discussed by myself.

    Integrity is of the upmost importance to me. If I am ever off base or misrepresent any information. Please call me out in the comments or contact me personally so I can correct myself and maintain the integrity of this project.

     With all that being said, let's begin on page 5, with Smith's introduction to the First Book of Nephi Chapter I

     "An account of Lehi and his wife Sariah, and his four Sons, being called, (beginning at the eldest,) Laman, Lemuel, Sam, and Nephi. The Lord warns Lehi to depart out of the land of Jerusalem, because he prophesieth unto the people concerning their iniquity; and they seek to destroy his life. He taketh three days journey into the wilderness with his family. Nephi taketh his brethren and returns to the land of Jerusalem after the record of the Jews. The account of their sufferings. They take the daughters of Ishmael to wife. They take their families and depart into the wilderness. Their sufferings and afflictions in the wilderness. The course of their travels. They come to the large waters. Nephi's brethren rebelled against him. He confounded them, and buildeth a Ship. They call the place Bountiful. They cross the large waters into the promised land. This is according to the account of Nephi; or in other words, I Nephi wrote this record." (The Book of Mormon, pg 5)

    This serves it's purpose in giving us a fantastic overview of the chapters to come. We can expect that each of the people identified in this introduction will play a role in the story and help shape the narrative. It is my theory that each of the characters we meet could be considered composite characters. Which means that they are representations of multiple people, combined together into a singular character or group of characters. We saw that this was a successful approach in my last post on re-contextualization.

   Composite characters are an incredibly common literary tactic, as it's easier to tell a story if you already have outside inspirations to pull from, and it gives the audience a sense of familiarity.  As we read through the First Book of Nephi, I will discuss each character, their circumstances, their visions and teachings and their potential inspirations.  Most of which I have identified as being a composite of only three sources.

     1. The life of Joseph Smith, including religious ideas and teachings he reasonably could have been exposed to.

     2. Well known American history, as it was taught at the time.

     3. The Bible and the Apocrypha.

     The very first person that we will be focusing on is the prophet Nephi, who serves as the narrative voice that is telling us the story of his family. 

     "I, Nephi, having been born of goodly parents, therefore I was taught somewhat in all the learning of my father; and having seen many afflictions in the course of my days -- nevertheless, having been highly favored of the Lord in all my days; yea, having had a great knowledge of the goodness and the mysteries of God, therefore I make a record of my proceedings in my days; yea, I make a record in the language of my father, which consists of the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians. And I know that the record which I make, to be true; and I make it with mine own hand; and I make it according to my knowledge." (The Book of Mormon, pg 5)

    I spent far longer than I would like to admit on this first paragraph. I searched through countless books and articles, heavily focused on the phrase "goodly parents" and the name of Nephi himself. I knew that Nephi was the name of a place in the Second Book of Maccabees from the Apocrypha. Which was available to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in their personal Bible which they purchased in October 1828. It's interesting to note that Oliver Cowdery did not begin helping Joseph Smith with the Book of Mormon until April 1829. Other than these facts, I didn't really have a direction to go and set it aside for a while.

 
The Second Book of Maccabees 1:36

     It was only upon the realization that Nephi was likely a composite character that I gave this chapter any kind of real attention. What if Nephi himself served as a representation of the gathering of Israel and that his name was simply inspired from this chapter? I revisited the book to try and understand it better.

     We first notice that the opening salutations by the author of this book seem to carry many of the central messages that we will find as we continue through the Book of Nephi. 




2 God be gracious unto you, and remember his covenant that he made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, his faithful servants;

3 And give you all a heart to serve him, and to do his will, with a good courage and a willing mind;

4 And open your hearts in his law and commandments, and send you peace,

5 And hear your prayers, and be at one with you, and never forsake you in time of trouble.

6 And now we be here praying for you. 
(2 Maccabees 1:2-6)

     The chapter goes on to tell us a story of priests performing a sacrifice in a temple, where they sprinkled a thick liquid onto their sacrifice before burning it. 

24 And the prayer was after this manner; O Lord, Lord God, Creator of all things, who art fearful and strong, and righteous, and merciful, and the only and gracious King:

25 The only giver of all things, the only just, almighty, and everlasting, thou that deliverest Israel from all trouble, and didst choose the fathers, and sanctify them:

26 Receive the sacrifice for thy whole people Israel, and preserve thine own portion, and sanctify it.

27 Gather those together that are scattered from us, de-liver them that serve among the heathen, look upon them that are despised and abhorred, and let the heathen know that
thou art our God.

28 Punish them that oppress us, and with pride do us wrong.

29 Plant thy people again in thy holy place, as Moses hath spoken.
(2 Maccabees 1:22-66)

     After the sacrifice was made, the priests collected the remaining liquid.

36 And Neemias called this thing Naphthar, which is as much as to say, A cleansing: but many men call it Nephi.
(2 Maccabees 1:36)

   Is it that far of a stretch to say that the name of Nephi himself was inspired by the name given to the liquid? It's entirely possible that it is just a coincidence, but we absolutely can not ignore that fact that much of the ideas we just read present themselves in the content of First Book of Nephi. The entire first Book of of Nephi is a mirror in purpose to these priests' prayer. That God is leading a tribe of Isreal away from their oppressors and guiding them to the promised land.  We could almost call it the First Book of Cleansing, which could easily tie in to puritan beliefs surrounding God's hand in the establishment of America. We will need to continue reading to see this idea unveils itself. Again, I don't want to get too far ahead of myself.

    So who in American history was credited as being the one who led colonizers to the Americas? Who exhibits the fearless trust in God and the unwavering devotion to God that Nephi himself is going to present in the following chapters? Who followed the will of God to the new world across the sea with a good courage and a willing mind? We turn to our history books to decide, as our answers can be found in one of the most notable accounts of American history of the time. The History of America. By William Robertson, 1777: Vol 1-2

The History of America, pg 56

     "...Christopher Columbus, a subject of the republic of Genoa. Neither the time nor place of his birth are known with certainty; but he was descended of an honourable family, though reduced to indigence by various misfortunes. His ancestors having betaken themselves for subsistence to a seafaring life, Columbus discovered, in his early youth, the peculiar character and talents which mark out a man for that profession. His parents, instead of thwarting this original propensity of his mind, seem to have encouraged and confirmed it, by the education which they gave him. After acquiring some knowledge of the Latin tongue, the only language in which science was taught at that time..." (The History of America. Pg 56)

    Sound familiar? Let's compare side by side with Nephi's self introduction.


    Is it possible that Joseph Smith simply re-contextualized Columbus's travels in a Biblical context? I honestly believe this to be the case. . We are going to be coming back the The History of America multiple times as the story of Nephi progresses. And in doing so, the inspirations for the character Nephi will become more clear

Check Your Understanding:

Test what you picked up from this post.

1. Why does the author analyze the 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon?




2. How will the Book of Mormon be treated in this project?




3. What is a composite character?




4. Which sources does the author believe primarily influenced Nephi?




5. What possible literary connection is suggested for the name “Nephi”?




6. Which historical figure is proposed as a major inspiration for Nephi?








- Next Post -

7- Lehi

The character of Lehi begins to take shape.


New here? Consider starting at the first post.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Blood and the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstein Letter

With the recent release of nearly 3.5 million pages of the Epstein files, there have been several connections made regarding Jeffery Epstein paying tuition for several students at BYU. The most notable of which is presented in what is known as the Esther Cohen-Tizer-Epstien Letter.    Some are questioning the authenticity of the letter, but some clues seem to point us to a woman named   Esther Cohen .  Lets look at a few connections. Note that these connections are not an attempt at making any accusations and are simply connections made through publicly available information. I will be updating this page as I find more information. EFTA00129111  Reference to the Seven Bowls School of Nutrition From Esther's website: alchemyofnourishment.com (Update March 04, 2026: The site seems to have been taken down) She began studying nutrition as a teenager: Which also seems to align with her site. Alchemy of Nourishment Along with the claim of residing in Colorado Alc...

Candon Dahle to Marry After Child Abuse Conviction

Former BYU baseball player Candon Dahle is expected to marry this week, less than a year after receiving a plea deal that allowed him to avoid sex offender registration despite admitting guilt to two felony counts involving the abuse of a child. News of the wedding has reignited criticism online, where many argue Dahle's return to ordinary life has come far too quickly in light of the allegations against him.  The topic was recently discussed on Instagram by  @justinthenickofcrime View this post on Instagram A post shared by Justin (@justinthenickofcrime) Dahle first made headlines in February 2025 when he was charged in Fremont County, Idaho, with felony lewd conduct with a child under the age of 16. According to the probable cause affidavit summarized by East Idaho News , prosecutors alleged Dahle sexually abused an 11-year-old girl and covered her mouth during one of the assaults. Authorities also filed a separate juvenile case in neighboring Bing...

A Bit of Original Evidence

In May 1900, Theodore A. Schroeder published an article titled A Bit of Original Evidence  in issue no. 9 of Lucifer’s Lantern . [1] The piece reproduces part of an 1887 letter apparently written by Mississippi attorney E. E. Baldwin to W. O. Norrell of Salt Lake City. [1] [2] Baldwin attributed the story to his uncle by marriage, James G. Horton, who allegedly said that Joseph Smith and several companions staged the discovery of the Book of Mormon plates as a practical joke and used a Bible-shaped box packed with sand. [1] Other accounts conflict with the claim that the box contained only sand. William Smith stated that members of the Smith family felt the plates through the cloth covering them and could distinguish their individual leaves. Martin Harris reported that Alvah Beman heard a metallic sound when the plates were placed inside the box. Those who said they lifted the covered object also estimated that it weighed between forty and sixty pounds, which would be difficult ...

The "Mormon" Trademark is About to Expire

 The request for Mormon Stories to rebrand has spread quickly through Mormon spaces. Followers learned that om November 14th 2025, the LDS Church had reached out with claims that the podcast was infringing on the “Mormon” trademark. The demand leaned on the legal idea that the Church owns the word.  The request was shared on social media by @mormstories, but those posts seem to have been removed. Fortunately, copies of the email were  shared on reddit. But there is a significant detail sitting behind this entire dispute. The Church will have to renew the "Mormon" trademark in the 2026 to 2027 window.  Source: USPTO database When that time comes, they must prove that they still use the word “Mormon” in active commerce. USPTO rules are clear on this point. A trademark only survives if the owner can show that it is still printed on actual goods or services that are still being sold or distributed. The official guidelines spell it out at uspto.gov under “ Keeping your r...

The Church is Changing the Sunday Schedule... Again

On September 6, 2026, Latter-day Saints will arrive at church to find the second hour rearranged. Sacrament meeting will remain no longer than 60 minutes. Adults and youth will then attend 25 minutes of Sunday School every week, followed by 25 minutes of Relief Society, elders quorum, Young Women, or Aaronic Priesthood quorum instruction. Primary will meet for 55 minutes. The alternating schedule introduced with two-hour church in 2019 will be gone.¹ The First Presidency's March announcement put the change plainly: In the new schedule, sacrament meeting will continue to be no longer than 60 minutes. After a 5‑minute transition, youth and adults will attend a 25‑minute Sunday School class each week. Following another 5‑minute transition, they will attend a 25‑minute priesthood quorum, Relief Society, or Young Women meeting. Primary will continue to meet weekly and will now last 55 minutes.¹ The schedule is a modest administrative revision. The institution capable of making it, thoug...

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

What Would It Take to Show Christianity Is False?

If Christianity's central claims are correct, then the universe has a creator who became incarnate in Jesus of Nazareth, died for the sins of the world, rose bodily from the dead, and continues to offer eternal life to those who trust in him. If these claims are true, they deserve not merely admiration but allegiance. They would represent the defining events of human history. If they are false, however, the implications are equally profound. Christianity has shaped civilizations, inspired art, influenced governments, comforted the dying, motivated charity, justified wars, and guided the lives of billions of people. A religion with that kind of influence should not simply be accepted because it is ancient or widely believed. It should be examined with the same seriousness its claims demand. C. S. Lewis understood this point perhaps better than anyone. Although remembered as one of Christianity's most influential defenders, he famously observed in God in the Dock: Essays on Theol...

Don't Be a Sea Lion

Religious arguments online tend to follow a familiar pattern. Someone makes a claim. Another person asks a question. An answer is given, but the questioner does not really engage with it. They ask for another source, then another explanation, then proof of some smaller point buried inside the original answer. Every response produces three new questions. When the other person finally becomes irritated or leaves, the questioner declares victory. “I was only asking questions.” “Why are you afraid of a civil discussion?” “If your position were true, you should be able to defend it.” This behavior is often called sea lioning. It looks like curiosity, but functions as harassment. It uses the language of calm discussion without accepting the responsibilities of an honest one. Religious believers do it. Critics of religion do it. Apologists, atheists, pastors, ex-believers, missionaries, and anonymous accounts do it...  No position has a monopoly on good faith. The name itself comes from D...

Caring for the Poor Has Been Low on the Mormon Priority List

We can't deny that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints provides millions of dollars each year in humanitarian aide, and that many members serve generously. But this aide is pennies compared to what the church spends on temples, their stock portfolio and real estate collections. Which begs the question, where does humanitarian work rank in the Church’s own mission? For decades, Church leaders defined that mission around preaching, ordinances, and salvation. By the Church’s own messaging, caring for the poor has historically been one of the Church's lowest institutional priorities. 1936 to 1981: Welfare was meant to build character During the Great Depression, the First Presidency tied welfare to work, independence, thrift, and self-respect. The goal was to help people provide for themselves. In 1936, J. Reuben Clark said that the welfare system had one primary goal: building character , an idea in which he repeated again in 1981. The real long-term objective of th...

If Mormon Leaders Know the Church Is False, Why Do They Stay?

A recent r/exmormon post asked a question that comes up often in discussions of Mormonism: if senior leaders know about the historical problems surrounding Joseph Smith, the Book of Mormon, polygamy, translation, and other controversial subjects, why would they spend the rest of their lives defending the Church? [1] If these leaders know the Church is false, why would they dedicate their entire finite lives to it? by u/ImportantPerformer16 in exmormon The question is valid because the men at the top of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are not generally isolated from the institution they lead. Apostles serve full-time for the remainder of their lives, and the Church describes the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve as prophets, seers, revelators, and the body authorized to declare doctrine and establish policy. [2] But the question contains an assumption that should be separated from the evidence. We have good reason to believe senior leaders know that many ...