Skip to main content

American Zion: The Literary World Surrounding the Book of Mormon

    The Book of Mormon presents America as a chosen land which was set apart, protected, and central to God’s plans. From the opening chapters, the narrative places its events on a continent prepared by God for righteous people. Lehi, the founding patriarch, is told that his family is being led to a "promised land" where those who serve God will prosper and those who rebel will perish.

    This idea repeats throughout the book. America is portrayed as a land of liberty and divine inheritance, meant to be free from kings and preserved for the sake of righteousness. This connection between sacred land and sacred purpose wasn’t unique to the Book of Mormon. It reflected a broader pattern in early American thinking, where many saw their national story through a biblical lens. The book, American Zion by Eran Shalev (affiliate link) looks at the strong influence of the Old Testament on early American thought. From the Revolution to the Civil War, many Americans used the Hebrew Bible to understand their identity, their purpose, and their future. 


    This became part of how the country explained its founding, justified its politics, and told its story. He demonstrates that early Americans saw themselves as a chosen people, and reflected this perception through biblical language. They believed they had escaped oppression and were building a righteous nation. 


    In the early 1800s, some writers started using the language of the King James Bible to tell American stories. They used its structure and vocabulary to frame their message. These weren’t religious texts, they were written histories or political statements told in scriptural form. Shalev refers to this genre of writing as psuedobiblicia. Shalev argues that the Book of Mormon was the pinnacle of this literary trend. 

    The Book of Mormon took familiar biblical language and applied it to the American story. The themes of covenant, judgment, and prophecy were already tied to American identity. Shalev’s work helps explain why the Book of Mormon felt credible and powerful to its early audience.


    Later, this Old Testament framework became a source of conflict in American discourse. As the country split over slavery, people on both sides used the Bible to defend their position. Some focused on stories of liberation. Others cited laws and social orders in scripture. The Bible remained central, but the unity behind its meaning began to break apart.

    American Zion offers a clear picture of how the Old Testament shaped early American thinking. It explains how Americans used scripture to give their politics and history a deeper meaning. It also helps us see the Book of Mormon as a product of that world. The book did not appear in isolation. It came from a culture already writing national stories in sacred language.

    Shalev does not argue for or against the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon. He simply explains the conditions that made it possible. 


-------

For more insights into the potential influences of the Book of Mormon, be sure to check out my project Without the Mormon Lens

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are You Temple Worthy?

Temple worthiness isn’t just about "good behavior" in Mormon teaching. It’s a gate that determines who qualifies for the highest blessings the religion offers. The church teaches that only people judged worthy can enter the temple, make covenants, and receive the ordinances that lead to exaltation, which is the belief that humans can become like God and live forever with their families in the celestial kingdom.  This makes worthiness interviews a spiritual checkpoint that can shape someone’s identity, their standing in the community, and even their hope for eternity.    Are You Worthy to Enter a Mormon Temple? Are You Worthy of the Mormon Temple? Yes No Restart Enter the Temple

The Smithsonian “Early Horses” Article Does Not Prove the Book of Mormon True

     A Smithsonian Magazine article titled “ Native Americans Spread Horses Through the West Earlier Than Thought ” (2023) has been circulating in Mormon spaces as supposed proof that horses existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon times.      The article summarizes a legitimate scientific study published in Science titled “ Early Dispersal of Domestic Horses Into the Great Plains and Northern Rockies .” (2023) But when you read what the researchers actually found, it’s clear this does not support the Book of Mormon’s claims at all.      What the Study Actually Found      The research team, led by William Timothy T. Taylor, analyzed horse remains found across the Great Plains and northern Rockies. Using radiocarbon dating, DNA sequencing, and isotopic analysis, they discovered that the animals were of Spanish origin. In other words, these were not remnants of ancient, native North American horses that somehow...

Early Mormon Criticisms - 1: Caution Against the Golden Bible

This series looks back at how early critics of the church reacted to the rise of Mormonism. Some mocked it, others warned against it, and a few tried to make sense of it. Each post features a real historical excerpt and some quick context to show how critics viewed the new faith as it was unfolding. For this first article, we are going to look at one of the first known in-depth public criticisms of the Book of Mormon, which appeared before the book itself was publicly available.  On February 20, 1830, Cornelius Camden Blatchley, a New York physician and writer known for his skeptical views on organized religion, published an article titled “Caution Against the Golden Bible” in the New-York Telescope . Written only weeks before the Book of Mormon’s official release in March of that year. Most of his arguments are still being used to this day. The Complaints Presented by Blatchley He specifies reading the Title page as well as   pages 353–368 of the original Book of Morm...

Code Names and Church Finances

Members of the Mormon church are expected to give ten percent of their income as tithing. It’s treated as a basic requirement of faithful membership. But even though members contribute a significant portion of their earnings, they aren’t given a clear accounting of how that money is used.  The Utah church does not release detailed budgets, financial reports, or yearly accounting. Members of the church donate fully on trust, without the kind of transparency they would expect from almost any other major charitable organization. Ensign Peak This lack of transparency became harder to overlook during the Ensign Peak investigation. For years the church separated its investment funds into thirteen shell companies and failed to fulfill federal reporting requirements.  The SEC found that this structure used by the church was designed to conceal the true size and unity of Ensign Peak’s holdings.   Per the SEC's 2023 report: " The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced c...

Are Mormons Christian?

People keep asking whether Mormons are Christian, as if that’s the issue that matters. It’s not. Mormons love this question since its probably one of the tamest aspects of the faith to question. The other day I was reading some comments on an online post that was debating the issue of whether or not Mormons were Christian, and this interaction caught my eye. One individual declared that the FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) “never were and never will be Mormon.”  Now, I can't imagine that many Mormons will share this same sentiment, considering that the FLDS church literally emerged from the exact same roots as the Utah church. But this interaction ironically demonstrates the exact same mindset that other Christians have about Mormons. Some Christians don’t consider Mormons Christian because Latter-day Saint teachings reject key doctrines established by early Christian creeds, like the Trinity, original sin, and the belief that Go...